<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rusjel</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Russian Journal of Economics and Law</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Economics and Law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2782-2923</issn><publisher><publisher-name>"TCE "Taglimat"" Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21202/1993-047X.11.2017.2.145-153</article-id><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">YRGLVZ</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">rusjel-2071</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ОБЗОР ИЗМЕНЕНИЙ В РЕГУЛИРОВАНИИ ПРОИЗВОДНЫХ ФИНАНСОВЫХ ИНСТРУМЕНТОВ В СООТВЕТСТВИИ С ДИРЕКТИВОЙ № 2014/65/ЕС «О РЫНКАХ ФИНАНСОВЫХ ИНСТРУМЕНТОВ»</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Review of changes in the regulation of derivatives in compliance with the directive No. 2014/65/ЕС “The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive”</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кригер</surname><given-names>А. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kriger</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">Angelica.kriger@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Университет Лейдена, Нидерланды; МГИМО МИД России; Посольство России в Нидерландах<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Leiden University, the Netherlands; Moscow State Institute for international Relations of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs;Russian Embassy in the Netherlands<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>145</fpage><lpage>153</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Кригер А.М., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Кригер А.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kriger A.M.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2071">https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2071</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель: выявление и проведение анализа изменений в правовом регулировании финансовых рынков в ЕС, произошедших в результате продолжительной реформы, одним из ключевых этапов которой стало принятие Директивы№ 2014/65/ЕС «О рынках финансовых инструментов». Данный документ определяет основы заключения сделок с производными финансовыми инструментами.Методы: формально-юридический, сравнительный, исторический, аналитический методы научного познания. Результаты: в ходе проведенной работы было установлено, что Регламент № 600/2014/ЕС Европейского парламента и Совета ЕС «О рынках финансовых инструментов» ввел трейдинговое обязательство для сделок с производными финансовыми инструментами, т. е. нормы о заключении договоров на одном из типов регулируемых площадок. Среди таких площадок были выделены регулируемые рынки, многосторонние и организованные торговые площадки, а также аналогичные платформы, зарегистрированные в третьих государствах. Делегированными регламентами Еврокомиссии были определены критерии распространения трейдингового обязательства на различные типы производных финансовых инструментов. В настоящий момент невозможно полноценно оценить результаты нововведений, поскольку большинство положений и актов вторичного права еще не вступили в силу или не приняты. Однако уже сейчас ясно, что реформа 2014 г. не оставит рынок производных финансовых инструментов в его прежнем состоянии. Директива № 2014/65/ЕС и Регламент № 600/2014/ЕС «О рынках финансовых инструментов» произвели революцию на них. Трейдинговое обязательство, введенное данными документами, заставило участников сделок по производным финансовым инструментам по-новому взглянуть на свою деятельность. В результате нововведений огромная часть сделок по ним должна быть переведена на регулируемые площадки, а внебиржевое заключение договоров для многих станет незаконным.Научная новизна: в статье впервые детально проанализирована и изучена реформа рынка производных финансовых инструментов в Европейском союзе, а также особенности функционирования регулируемых площадок. Практическая значимость: выводы и положения статьи могут быть использованы при подготовке нормативно- правовых актов в сфере финансового права Евразийского экономического союза, а также в рамках совершенствования законодательства Российской Федерации.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Objective: to identify and analyze the changes in the legal regulation of financial markets in the EU, which occurred as a result of continuous reforms, one of the key steps of which was the adoption of Directive 2014/65/EC “On financial tools markets”. This document defines the framework for transactions with derivative financial instruments.Methods: formal-legal, comparative, historical, analytical methods of scientific cognition.Results: it was found that Regulation No. 600/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the EU Council “On the financial tools markets” introduced the trading obligation to transactions with derivative financial instruments, that is, the rules on signing contracts on a certain type of regulated platforms. These platforms include regulated markets, multilateral and organized trading platforms, as well as similar platforms registered in the third states. The delegated regulations of the European Commission define the criteria for the diffusion of trading obligations onto various types of financial derivatives. At the moment it is impossible to fully evaluate the innovations results, as most of the provisions and secondary legal acts have not yet come into force or have not been adopted. However, it is clear that the reform of 2014 will not leave the derivatives market in its previous state. Directive No. 2014/65/EU and Regulation No. 600/2014/EU “On financial tools markets” produced a revolution for them. The trading obligation imposed by these documents has forced the parties, involved into transactions with derivative financial instruments, to adopt a new perspective on their activities. As a result of the innovation, a huge part of transactions with them has to be transferred onto regulated platforms and the OTC contracts for many will become illegal.Scientific novelty: the article for the first time analyses and studies the reform of the derivatives market in the EuropeanUnion, as well as peculiarities of functioning of regulated platforms.Practical significance: the findings and provisions of the article can be used for the preparation of normative legal acts in the sphere of financial law of the Eurasian Economic Union, as well as for the improvement of the legislation of the Russian Federation.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>международное право</kwd><kwd>европейское право</kwd><kwd>производные финансовые инструменты</kwd><kwd>деривативы</kwd><kwd>ЕС</kwd><kwd>многосторонняя регулируемая площадка</kwd><kwd>регулируемый рынок</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Касьянов Р. А. Общие тенденции правового регулирования рынка ценных бумаг в Европейском союзе // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. 2013. № 4. С. 93-97.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Касьянов Р. А. Общие тенденции правового регулирования рынка ценных бумаг в Европейском союзе // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. 2013. № 4. С. 93-97.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Касьянов Р. А. Европейский опыт правового регулирования финансовых рынков и возможности его применения в России // Вестник МГИМО - Университета. 2013. № 4. С. 267-274.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Касьянов Р. А. Европейский опыт правового регулирования финансовых рынков и возможности его применения в России // Вестник МГИМО - Университета. 2013. № 4. С. 267-274.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maloney N. Reform or Revolution? The Financial Crisis, EU Financial Markets Law, and the European Securities and Markets Authority // International Comparative Law Quarterly. April 2011. Рр. 521-533.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maloney N. Reform or Revolution? The Financial Crisis, EU Financial Markets Law, and the European Securities and Markets Authority // International Comparative Law Quarterly. April 2011. Рр. 521-533.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глава 2 Директивы Европейского парламента и Совета ЕС 2014/65/ЕС о рынках финансовых инструментов от 15.04.2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Глава 2 Директивы Европейского парламента и Совета ЕС 2014/65/ЕС о рынках финансовых инструментов от 15.04.2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ст. 5 Директивы Европейского парламента и Совета ЕС 2014/65/ЕС о рынках финансовых инструментов от 15.04.2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ст. 5 Директивы Европейского парламента и Совета ЕС 2014/65/ЕС о рынках финансовых инструментов от 15.04.2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Economist Intelligence Unit, Benefits and Unintended Consequences of Financial Markets Reform. 2012. Рр. 1-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Economist Intelligence Unit, Benefits and Unintended Consequences of Financial Markets Reform. 2012. Рр. 1-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McMahon J., Moloney N. III Financial Market regulation in the Post-Financial Services Action Plan Era // International Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 55, № 4. Рр. 982-992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McMahon J., Moloney N. III Financial Market regulation in the Post-Financial Services Action Plan Era // International Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 55, № 4. Рр. 982-992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yeoh P. Derivatives: Regulatory Reforms and New Rules // Business Law Review. 2010. № 31. Рр. 264-271.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yeoh P. Derivatives: Regulatory Reforms and New Rules // Business Law Review. 2010. № 31. Рр. 264-271.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dalhuisen J. Financial Services, Products, Risks and Regulation in Europe after the EU 1998 Action Plan and Basle II // European Business Law Review. 2007. Vol. 18. Рр. 819-1091.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dalhuisen J. Financial Services, Products, Risks and Regulation in Europe after the EU 1998 Action Plan and Basle II // European Business Law Review. 2007. Vol. 18. Рр. 819-1091.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">White T. From the Group of Twenty to the Group of Two: The Need for Harmonizing derivatives Regulation between the United States and the European Union // Law and Contemporary Problems. 2015. Vol. 78. Рр. 301-333.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">White T. From the Group of Twenty to the Group of Two: The Need for Harmonizing derivatives Regulation between the United States and the European Union // Law and Contemporary Problems. 2015. Vol. 78. Рр. 301-333.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ortino M. The Role and Functioning of Mutual Recognition in the European Market of Financial Services // International Comparative Law Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 56, № 2. Рр. 309-338.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ortino M. The Role and Functioning of Mutual Recognition in the European Market of Financial Services // International Comparative Law Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 56, № 2. Рр. 309-338.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferrarini G., Moloney N. Reshaping Order Execution in the EU and the Role of Interest Groups: From MiFID I to MiFID II // European Business Organization Law Review. 2012. Vol. 13, № 4. Pp. 557-597.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ferrarini G., Moloney N. Reshaping Order Execution in the EU and the Role of Interest Groups: From MiFID I to MiFID II // European Business Organization Law Review. 2012. Vol. 13, № 4. Pp. 557-597.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/searchRegister?core=esma_registers_mifid_rma (дата обращения: 09.01.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: https://registers.esma.europa.eu/publication/searchRegister?core=esma_registers_mifid_rma (дата обращения: 09.01.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mathias M. Siems, The Foundations of Securities Law // European Business Law Review. 2009. № 1. Рр. 141-171.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mathias M. Siems, The Foundations of Securities Law // European Business Law Review. 2009. № 1. Рр. 141-171.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kristen F. G. H. Integrity of European Financial Markets: Background, Objectives, Reasons, Overall Contents and Implications of the Market Abuse Directive // European Company Law. 2005. Vol. 2. Pp. 13-21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kristen F. G. H. Integrity of European Financial Markets: Background, Objectives, Reasons, Overall Contents and Implications of the Market Abuse Directive // European Company Law. 2005. Vol. 2. Pp. 13-21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Buckley J., Howarth D., Quaglia L. Internal Market: The Ongoing Struggle to ‘Protect’ Europe From Money Men // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2012. Vol. 50. Pp. 99-115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buckley J., Howarth D., Quaglia L. Internal Market: The Ongoing Struggle to ‘Protect’ Europe From Money Men // Journal of Common Market Studies. 2012. Vol. 50. Pp. 99-115.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aron T. Organised Trading Facility: How They Differ from MTFs // Financier Worldwide Magazine. July 2015. Pp. 27-29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aron T. Organised Trading Facility: How They Differ from MTFs // Financier Worldwide Magazine. July 2015. Pp. 27-29.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">URL: https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2015/11/2015-esma-1464_-_final_report_-_draft_rts_and_its_ on_mifid_ii_and_mifir.pdf (дата обращения: 09.01.2017)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">URL: https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2015/11/2015-esma-1464_-_final_report_-_draft_rts_and_its_ on_mifid_ii_and_mifir.pdf (дата обращения: 09.01.2017)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aubry N., Mickey M. MiFID: Where Did it Come From, Where is It Taking Us // International Business Law Review. 2007. Is. 4. Pp. 171-186.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aubry N., Mickey M. MiFID: Where Did it Come From, Where is It Taking Us // International Business Law Review. 2007. Is. 4. Pp. 171-186.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garslian L. Towards a Universal Model Regulatory Framework for Derivatives: Post-Crisis Conclusions from the United States and the European Union // University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. 2015. Vol. 37. Pp. 941-1026.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garslian L. Towards a Universal Model Regulatory Framework for Derivatives: Post-Crisis Conclusions from the United States and the European Union // University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. 2015. Vol. 37. Pp. 941-1026.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peirce H. Derivatives Clearinghouses: Clearing the Way to Failure // Cleveland State Law Review. 2015. Vol. 64. Pp. 589-660.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peirce H. Derivatives Clearinghouses: Clearing the Way to Failure // Cleveland State Law Review. 2015. Vol. 64. Pp. 589-660.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ho S. J. How Will Emir Affect Corporates?// International Financial Law Review. April 2013. Pp. 48-50.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ho S. J. How Will Emir Affect Corporates?// International Financial Law Review. April 2013. Pp. 48-50.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
