PROCESSES OF CREATION OF INSTITUTIONAL FIELD OF SERVICES MARKET
Abstract
Objective: To view the necessity of the urgent institutional transformations in national economy and revealing of the new phenomena and trends in development of institutions in the services market. Methods: Historical-economic and systemic-logical methods were used. Results: Basing on the analysis of various processes in the country’s economy the necessity of institutional transformations in the country’s market is stated; the main parts of institutional field forming are shown; attention is paid to the problems in institutional provision for service market uder Russia’s membership in WTO; new institutional units of the service market are systematized. Scientific novelty: Highlighting of the main directions of institutional transformations in the services market (transformation of property relations, creating the institutions of services market, reduction of the level of informal relations in institutional transformations, training of personnel for maintaining th institutions of services market); comparing the data of development of institutional units of services market in Russia in 1990 and 2010; determining the self-movement of services market as integrational interrelation of organizational-economic, organizational-managerial, organizational-technological and organizational-institutional components (institutions), determining the “new” institutional units of services market. Practical value: The results can be applied for determiningthe strategic and institutional development of the country economy under strengthening of WTO role in te Russian society functioning.
References
1. Бурганов Р.А. Трансформация сферы рынка услуг как фактор модернизации экономики // Модернизация Российской экономики: уроки прошлого, шансы и риски: тезисы участников XIX Кондратьевских чтений. – М.: Международный фонд Н.Д. Кондратьева, 2012.
2. Доклад о конкурентоспособности России 2011. Закладывая фундамент устойчивого процветания. – URL: http://www.mfc-moscow.com/assets/files/analytics/WEF_GCR_Russia_Report_2011_ru.pdf
3. Кочетков А.А., Кочеткова Л.И. К вопросу о генезисе постиндустриального общества // Вопросы философии. – 2010. – № 2. – С. 23–34.
4. Joseph Francois, Bernard Hoekman. Services Trade and Policy // Journal of Economic Literature. Sep 2010, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 642–692
5. North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. N.Y. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
6. Williamson O. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. XXXVIII (September), pp. 595-613.
7. Villalonga B. Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effect // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, pp. 42(1), 43–77.
8. Модернизация России: социально-гуманитарные измерения / под ред. акад. Н.Я. Петракова. – М.; СПб.: Нестор-История. – 2011.
9. Винокур С. Массовые протесты в Москве: взгляд экономистов // Вопросы экономики. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 148–158.
10. Хайек Ф. Пагубная самонадеянность. Ошибки социализма. – М.: Новости, 1992.
11. Евпланов А. Физкультура // Российская бизнес-газета. – 2012. – 20 марта.
12. Вендинга нет. – URL: http://www.retailer.ru/item/id/59592/
Review
For citations:
Burganov R.A. PROCESSES OF CREATION OF INSTITUTIONAL FIELD OF SERVICES MARKET. Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2013;(2):26-32. (In Russ.)
Views:
115
Email this article 
