REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PUNISHMENT EXECUTION INDIVIDUALIZATION AS AN IMPORTANT FACTOR OF COUNTERACTION TO CORRUPTION AND SUBJECTIVITY OF PAROLE INSTITUTION

Objective: to prove the importance of the consistent implementation of the requirements of the principle of punishment individualization in the practice of penitentiary system of the Russian Federation. Methods: The methodology of research is based on dialectic which allows to consider state-legal phenomena in its development and dynamics, in close interaction with other factors of social life. Results: the main conclusion of this article is the proposition that the consistent fulfillment of the requirements of the punishment individualization principle can bar the manifestation of potential elements of subjectivity and corruption in the activities of the penitentiary institutions officials in the implementation of the legislative framework regulating the parole process. Scientific novelty: Justification of the statement that only the consistent fulfillment of the requirements of the punishment individualization principle can currently bar the manifestation of potential elements of subjectivity and corruption in the activities of the penitentiary institutions officials in the implementation of the legislative framework regulating the parole process. Practical value: conclusions and findings formulated in the work may be useful in legislative, law-enforcement and educational spheres of legal activity.

punishment execution, individualization of punishment execution, parole, penitentiary practice of foreign countries, behanior off the convicted, reformation of the convicted, psychological factors, timeserving and conformity of the convicted, corruption, subjectivity of the officials, court practice

1. URL: http://www.pbc-clcc.gc.ca/parle/parle-eng.shtml

2. URL: http://www.riza.tripod.com/id1.html

3. URL: http://jurisonline.in/?p=458

4. URL: http://www.fsin.su/news/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=11802

5. URL: http://top.rbc.ru/society/28/02/2011/551425.shtml

6. Кашуба Ю. А., Скиба А. П. Институт условно-досрочного освобождения: новый взгляд // Человек: преступление и наказание. 2010. № 1(72). С. 14-17

7. Иногамова Л. В. Условно-досрочное освобождение от наказания. Тюмень, 1992. 73 с

8. Янчук И.А. Критерии оценки степени исправления осужденных: какими им быть? // Вестник Вологодского института права и экономики ФСИН России. 2008. № 4. С. 5-58

9. Комментарий к ст. 172. «Основания освобождения от отбывания наказания» // Уголовно-исполнительный кодекс Российской Федерации: постатейный научно-практический комментарий / под общей ред. А. С. Михлина и В. И. Селиверстова. М., 2004. 233 с

10. Зверева О.Н. Реализация принципа индивидуализации наказания при исполнении лишения свободы: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. Рязань, 2005. 233 с

11. Севрюгин А.С. Критерии и показатели исправления и перевоспитания осужденных. Рязань, 1989. 81 с

12. Антонян Ю. М., Эминов В. Е., Еникеев М. И. Психология преступления и наказания. М., 2001. 454 с

13. Усс А. Допустимо ли исправлять осужденных // Преступление и наказание. 1994. № 1(2). С. 29-33