On some conceptual sources of the wealth maximization theory by Richard Posner: Adam Smith and Jeremy Bentham

Objective: to identify some aspects of the historical genesis of the ideas of wealth maximization theory by Richard AllenPosner - one of the main representatives of the Chicago school of economic analysis of law.Methods: post-classical approach to the cognition of social phenomena, which allows analyzing them in their historical development and functioning as the complex of objective and subjective factors; portrait method; comparative legal and formal logical analysis.Results: the wealth maximization theory by R. Posner is one of the most well-known ethical and legal theories in the English- speaking world. It has many followers, and it is often applied as the basis of functioning by acting Western politicians and representatives of political parties. There are also opponents who stand in different positions. The article provides arguments to confirm that R. Posner’s theory is based on the ideas of A. Smith and J. Bentham. In particular, it is A. Smith’s idea that the engine of human development is the desire to improve human living conditions, which is the desire to increase private and public wealth. Also important are the ideas of the “invisible hand of the market” and of self-interest, which is inextricably linked with empathy. From the creative heritage of J. Bentham, Posner singled out the idea of pleasure as a criterion for justifying actions, although he criticized it. Posner replaced pleasure with utility, aimed at maximizing wealth. Posner also recognizes that Bentham’s idea, which has become one of the key ones in the economic analysis of law, is that punishment is a way to impose costs for criminal activity. The authors conclude that the ideas of these thinkers are the basis of the wealth maximization theory by R. Posner, which, in turn, is an authoritative normative legal theory within the Chicago school of economic analysis of law.Scientific novelty: for the first time in the Russian science, this article examines the general theoretical foundations of the welfare maximization theory created by the most famous American lawyer, thinker and economist R. Posner and reveals its ideological origins. Understanding of these origins makes it possible both to criticize this theory and to study the possibilities of using its ideas in the Russian perspective.Practical significance: the ideas that served as the basis for Posner’s wealth maximization theory can be used both for further criticism of this theory and for the development of the Russian legal science and philosophy of law. These ideas can also be used in political practice, law-making, and judicial law-enforcement.

«невидимая рука» рынка

1. Дорохин В. С. Ричард Познер и его теория максимизации благосостояния // Правоведение. 2017. № 3. С. 28-45.

2. Дорохин В. С. Чикагская школа права и экономики: история и основные представители // Коммуникативная теория права и современные проблемы юриспруденции: К 60-летию Андрея Васильевича Полякова. Коллективная монография. В 2 т. T. 2. Актуальные проблемы философии права и юридической науки в связи с коммуникативной теорией права / под ред. М. В. Антонова, И. Л. Честнова; предисл. Д. И. Луковской, Е. В. Тимошиной. СПб.: Алеф-Пресс, 2014. С. 173-194.

3. Дорохин В. С. Ричард Познер и экономический анализ права // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2014. № 1. С. 17-19.

4. Дорохин В. С. Портреты ученых-юристов: Гэри Беккер // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2014. № 2. С. 29-35.

5. Calabresi G. Some thoughts on risk distribution and the law of torts // Yale Law Journal. 1961. Vol. 70. Рp. 499-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/794261

6. Coase R. H. The problem of social cost // Journal of Law and Economics. 1960. Vol. 3. Рp. 1-44. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1086/466560

7. Coleman J. L. Efficiency, utility, and wealth maximization // Hofstra Law Review. 1980. Vol. 8. Рp. 509-551.

8. Cooter R., Ulen T. Law and Economics. 6th edition. Berkeley Law Books, 2016.

9. Dworkin R. Why Efficiency? // Hofstra Law Review. 1980. Vol. 8. Рp. 563-590.

10. Dworkin R. Is Wealth a Value? // The Journal of Legal Studies. 1980. Vol. 9. Рp. 191-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467636

11. Kaldor N. Welfare Propositions of Economic and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility // Economic Journal. 1939. Vol. 49. Рp. 222-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2224835

12. Kaplow L., Shavell S. Fairness versus Welfare. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002. Pp. XXII + 544. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1017/s0953820805221611

13. Posner R. A. Economic analysis of law. 7th edition. Aspen Publishers, 2007.

14. Posner R. A. Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory // The Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 8. 1979. Рp. 103-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467603

15. Posner R. A. The Economics of Justice. Harvard, 1981. 415 p.

16. Одинцова М. И. Экономика права. М.: ГУ-ВШЭ, 2007. 345 с.

17. Карапетов А. Г. Экономический анализ права. М.: Статут, 2016. 528 с.

18. Coase R. H. Adam Smith's View of Man // The Journal of Law and Economics. October. 1976. Pp. 529-546. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1086/466886

19. Smith А. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Glasgow, 1759.

20. Smith А. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London, 1776.

21. Smith D. Free Lunch: Easily Digestible Economics. 2010. 304 p.

22. Stigler G. J. The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith // Journal of Political Economy. 1976. № 84 (6). Pp. 1199-1213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260508

23. Montes L. Newtonianism and Adam Smith // The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. 36-53.

24. Fiori S. Adam Smith on Method: Newtonianism, History, Institutions and the “Invisible Hand” // Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2012. Vol. 34 (3). Pp. 411-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1053837212000405

25. Newton I. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934. XXXV + 680 р.

26. Smith A. The History of Astronomy // Essays of Adam Smith. London, 1869.

27. Medick H. Naturzustand und Naturgeschichte der burgerlichen Gesellschaft: Die Ursprunge der burgerlichen Sozialtheorie als Geschichtsphilosophie und Sozialwissenschaft bei Samuel Pufendorf, John Locke und Adam Smith. Gottingen, 1973. 330 s.

28. Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. М.; Л.: Госсоцэкгиз, 1935. Т. 2. 475 c.

29. Смит А. Теория нравственных чувств. М.: Республика, 1997. 351 c.

30. Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. М.; Л.: Госсоцэкгиз, 1935. Т. 1. 371 c.

31. Поляков А. В. Чистое учение о праве Ганса Кельзена, идея естественного права и справедливость: взгляд коммуникативиста // Мир человека: нормативное измерение - 6. Нормы мышления, восприятия, поведение: сходство, различие, взаимосвязь: сборник трудов международной научной конференции (Саратов, 27-29 июня 2019 г.). Саратов: Изд-во ФГБОУ ВО «Саратовская государственная юридическая академия», 2019. С. 205-224.

32. Поляков А. В. Конституция России, традиционные ценности и основной принцип права // Конституция и общественный прогресс. Вторые Прокопьевские чтения. Научное электронное издание. Калининград: Изд-во БФУ им. И. Канта, 2019. С. 13-23.

33. А. П. Куницын и проблемы формирования российской идеи правовой справедливости / С. В. Волкова, Н. И. Малышева, А. В. Поляков, М. И. Юдина // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2020. № 56. С. 99-106.

34. Поляков А. В. Коммуникативный смысл действительности права, его признания и идеи справедливости // Правовая коммуникация государства и общества: отечественный и зарубежный опыт: сборник трудов Международной научной конференции (Воронеж, 11-12 сентября 2020 г.) / ред. М. А. Беляев, В. В. Денисенко. Воронеж: НАУКА-ЮНИПРЕСС, 2020. С. 9-18.

35. Paganelli M. P. The Adam Smith Problem in Reverse: Self-Interest in The Wealth of Nations and The Theory of Moral Sentiments // History of Political Economy. 2008. № 40 (2). Pp. 365-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2008-006

36. Viner J. Adam Smith and Laissez-Faire // Journal of Political Economy. 1927. Vol. 35. № 2. Рp. 198-232. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1086/253837

37. Hart H. L. A. American Jurisprudence Through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream // Georgia law review. 1977. Vol. 11, № 5. С. 988-989.

38. Waks R. Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 335 р.

39. Бентам И. Введение в основания нравственности и законодательства. М.: РОССПЭН, 1998. 415 c.

40. Hutcheson F. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises / ed. Wolfgang Leidhold. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004. 272 р.

41. Hruschka J. The Greatest Happiness Principle and Other Early German Anticipations of Utilitarian Theory // Utilitas. 1991. Vol. 3. Pp. 165-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820800001096

42. Bentham J. The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Judicial Procedure, Anarchical Fallacies, works on Taxation. Vol. 2. Edinburg, 1843. 600 p.

43. Hart H. L. A. Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Clarendon Рress, 1982. 280 p.

44. Posner R. A. Economic Analysis of Law. 7th edition. Aspen Publishers, 2007. 787 p.

45. Weinrib E. J. Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory // The University of Toronto Law Journal Vol. 30, № 3. 1980. Pp. 307-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/825489

46. Veljanovski C. G. Wealth Maximization, Law and Ethics - On the Limits of Economic Efficiency // International Review of Law and Economics. 1981. Vol. 1. Pp. 5-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(81)90003-x

47. Posner R.A. The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication // Hofstra Law Review. 1980. Vol. 8. Pp. 487-507.