ANALYSIS OF NEW RECOMMENDATIONS OF BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION
Abstract
Objective: determining and analyzing differences between the old and new recommendations of Basel committee on banking supervision. Methods: abstract-logical. Results: basing on evaluation of various researchers’ opinions in the studies area, as well as studying the methodology and norms elaborated in Basel I, ІІ и ІІІ, the new requirements are analyzed and summarized for banking capital according to Basel ІІІ provisions. The issues are interpreted of social-economic essence of banking capital. Special attention is paid to the issue of sufficiency of banking capital. Scientific novelty: positive and negative aspects are revealed of new recommendations of Basel committee on banking supervision. The author comes to the conclusion that, in spite the critics of new liquidity indicators, they will not significantly influence developing crediting in long-term prospect. Besides, the proposed grouping of the new requirements to banking capital is optimal – they are group by the extent of importance. Practical value: possibility to efficiently implement the new recommendations of Basel committee on banking supervision.
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure:
The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Article info:
Date submitted: 11.10.2021
Published: 30.09.2013
The author has read and approved the final manuscript.
Peer review info:
"Russian Journal of Economics and Law" thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Editorial comment:
In case of any discrepancies in a text or the differences in its layout between the pdf-version of an article and its html-version the priority is given to the pdf-version.
About the Author
D. S. Mel’Nik
Kiev National Economic University named after Vadym Get’man
Russian Federation
References
1. Примостка Л. Методы оценки стоимости и определения достаточности банковского капитала // Финансовый рынок Украины. – 2008. – № 10. – С. 27–29.
2. Коваленко В.В., Черкашина М.Ф. Методические подходы к определению уровня капитализации банковской системы // Финансы Украины. – 2010. – № 10. – С. 73–85.
3. Мищенко В., Незнакова А. Базель ІІІ: новые подходы к регулированию банковского сектора // Вестник НБУ. – 2011. – № 1. – С. 4–9.
4. Basel II capital framework enhancements announced by the Basel Committee. – URL: www.bis.org/press/p090713.htm
5. Strengthening the resilience of the banking sector. – URL: Http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs164pdf
6. Tarullo D. Financial regulation in the wake of the crisis / Speech at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Washington DC. – 2009. – 8 June. – URL: http://www.bis.org/review/r0906d.pdf (дата обращения: 16.04.2013)
7. Consulation Paper on further possible changes to the capital. Requirements Directiba. – URL: http://www.c-ebs.org/documents/Publications/Other-Publications/others/2010/Comments-to-CRDIV.aspx
8. Countercyclical capital buffer proposa // Consultative document. – 2010. – July. – URL: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs172.htm
9. Кльоб В.Л., Кльоб Р.Л. Совершенствование анализа и прогнозирования банковской деятельности // Инвестиции: практика и опыт. – 2010. – № 11. – С. 62–64.
For citations:
Mel’Nik D.S.
ANALYSIS OF NEW RECOMMENDATIONS OF BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION. Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2013;(3):166-170.
(In Russ.)
Views:
151