Preview

Russian Journal of Economics and Law

Advanced search

Fall of transactional sector: april trends and consequences of economic policy alternatives

https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.2.381-391

EDN: KDNPRO

Abstract

Objective: to assess the current trends in the development of the transaction sector in Russia and to identify alternatives to implementing economic policy in the context of restrictions on economic activity.Methods: the research used general scientific methods of cognition; content analysis of literary sources and mass media; comparative discursive categorical analysis.Results: the corona virus pandemic highlighted new challenges for the economies of almost all countries of the world. One of the manifestations of the economic systems’ crisis associated with the pandemic was the reduction of the transaction sector, which determines the need to assess its impact on the Russian economy. Political-economic cause-and-effect relationships of the fight against corona virus and the state of national economies are considered by the example of the “Trump dilemma”. It was found that under strict restrictive measures imposed by most countries of the world, the most vulnerable were transaction sector businesses, primarily in the service sector. By the example of sports as a part of the “impression economy” in Russia and other countries of the world, we consider the range of negative consequences following the cancellation of sports events and the reduction of sports clubs funding.Scientific novelty: the research presents the author’s position on the existing discourse in the Russian literature on the content and scope of the transaction sector. We also recommend a way to update the choice of socio-economic alternatives to solve the problem of economic functioning under restrictions associated with the corona virus pandemic.Practical significance: the results obtained can be used as recommendations for regional authorities when evaluating and developing economic policy alternatives.

About the Authors

E. A. Kapoguzov
Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky
Russian Federation


R. I. Chupin
Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Wallis J. J., North D. C. Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970 // Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth / S. L. Engerman, R. E. Gallman (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986. Pp. 95-161.

2. Ghertman M. Measuring Macro-economic Transaction Costs: A Comparative Perspective and Possible Policy Implications // Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, 1998.

3. Dollery В., Leong W. Measuring the transaction sector in the Australian economy 1911-1991 // Australian Economic History Review. 1998. № 38 (3). Pp. 207-231.

4. Hazledine T. Measuring the New Zealand transaction sector, 1956-98, with an Australian comparison // New Zealand Economic Papers. 2001. № 35 (1). Pp. 77-100.

5. The Transaction Sector in the Bulgarian Economy / G. Chobanov, H. Egbert, A. Giuredzheklieva // Paper Presented at the Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics. Reykjavik, 2007.

6. Sulejewicz A., Graca P. Measuring the transaction sector in the Polish economy, 1996 to 2002 // 9th Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, Barcelona, Spain. 22-25 September, 2005.

7. Dagnino-Pastore J., Farina P. Transaction costs in Argentina // 3rd Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics. Washington, USA, 16-18 September, 1999.

8. F. Da Measuring Transaction Costs in the Chinese Economy (1978-2007) // EALR. Jul. - Dez. 2010. Vol. 1, № 2. Pp. 281-300.

9. Гурова И. М. Трансакционный сектор: основные теоретические аспекты // Экономика и социум: современные модели развития. 2018. Т. 8. № 1 (19). С. 109-124.

10. Хасанов И. Ш., Хасанова К. И. Зарубежный опыт измерения трансакционного сектора национальной экономики (методология определения трансакционных издержек американскими экономистами Дугласом Нортом и Джоном Уоллисом) // Вестник Татарского государственного гуманитарно-педагогического университета. 2008. № 3 (14). С. 67-70.

11. Попов Е., Веретенникова А. Ю. Структура и размер трансакционного сектора // Экономист. 2014. № 7. С. 21-23.

12. Стратулат И. В., Фролов Д. П. Трансакционный сектор экономики: концептуализация и институционализация // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015. № 1-1. С. 467.

13. Литвинцева Г. П., Гахова Н. А. Динамика трансакционного сектора экономики России: как учил Д. Норт // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2016. Т. 8. № 2. С. 38-50.

14. Шарафутдинова К. А., Власов М. В. Сравнительный анализ трансакционных издержек // Журнал экономической теории. 2019. Т. 16, № 4. С. 881-886.

15. Попов Е. В. Теория трансакционной оценки экономических институтов // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Социально-экономические науки. 2014. № 2 (23). С. 44-59.

16. Сухарев О. С. Теория дисфункций: проблема управления и уточнение целей макроэкономического развития // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. 2020. № 1. С. 95-112.


Review

For citations:


Kapoguzov E.A., Chupin R.I. Fall of transactional sector: april trends and consequences of economic policy alternatives. Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2020;14(2):381-391. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.2.381-391. EDN: KDNPRO

Views: 228


ISSN 2782-2923 (Print)