Preview

Russian Journal of Economics and Law

Advanced search

THE PITFALLS OF DIFFERENTIATION IN THE FINANCING OF RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES

https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.2.38-58

EDN: VZKDFZ

Abstract

Objective: to identify the causes and consequences of the increasing stratification of higher educational institutions by the volumes and sources of financing, as well as by the areas of training. Methods: during the research we used methods of statistical and economic analysis of the results of the universities’ activities. Using econometric models, the relationships were estimated of the resource base of higher education, industrial and economic potential of Russian regions; an empirical analysis of factors influencing the increasing public demand for higher education was conducted. Results: the trends of structural changes in the demand for higher education in Russia during the period from 2001 to 2014 were described, the regional differentiation of financial provision of higher educational institutions in the transition to effective contract work was evaluated. The major risks were identified, associated with: the structural mismatch of the demand for higher education from families and the offer of admission quotas for the budget-funded education; with increasing regional differentiation, which provokes the separation of the Russian universities by the volumes and sources of financial provision; with high commitments to increase the salaries of the teaching staff leading to a shortage of funds for maintenance of the property complex and ensuring of the educational process, which jeopardizes the quality of educational programs’ implementation. Scientific novelty: basing on the empirical analysis using econometric models, the tendencies are identified of structural changes in the demand for higher education in the Russian regions; the impact is assessed of the economic crisis and the payable demand of families on the financial provision of universities; risks are identified and justified in the differentiation of Russian universities’ financing. Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used by experts in the field of Economics and Management in designing financial provision and development strategies of higher educational organizations.

About the Authors

I. V. Abankina
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


T. V. Abankina
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


L. M. Filatova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


References

1. Сценарии устойчивого финансирования высшего образования / Д. Салми, А. П. Шадрикова, Я. А. Вазякова, Т. А. Мешкова // Вестник международных организаций. 2010. № 1. С. 79-95.

2. Rozada M. G., Menendez A. Public University in Argentina: subsidizing the rich? // Economics of Education Review. 2002. No. 21. Pp. 341-351.

3. Caner A., Okten C. Higher education in Turkey: Subsidizing the rich or the poor? // Economics of Education Review. 2013. No. 35. Pp. 75-92.

4. Без учета расходов на оплату коммунальных, транспортных услуг, услуг связи и расходов на содержание имущества организаций высшего образования, утвержденных в соответствии с Постановлением Правительства Российской Федерации № 640 «О порядке формирования государственного задания на оказание государственных услуг (выполнение работ) в отношении федеральных государственных учреждений и финансового обеспечения выполнения государственного задания» от 26.06.2015.

5. Partanen A. What Americans keep ignoring about Finland’s school success. From The Atlantic Mobile. December 29. 2011. URL: http://m.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/12/what-americans-keep-ignoring-about-finlands-school-success/250564/ (дата обращения: 07.07.2015).

6. Sahlberg P. Finnish Lessons. What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Columbia University, 2011. 208 p.

7. Wolff E., Baumol W., Saini A. A comparative analysis of education costs and outcomes: The United States vs. other OECD countries // Economics of Education Review. 2014. No. 39. Pp. 1-21.

8. Bruckmeier K., Wigger B.U. The effects of tuition fees on transition from high school to university in Germany // Economics of Education Review. 2014. No. 41. Pp. 14-23.

9. Hübner M. Do tuition fees affect enrolment behavior? Evidence from a ‘natural experiment’ in Germany // Economics of Education Review. 2012. No. 31. Pp. 949-960.

10. Berger M., Kostal T. Financial resources, regulation, and enrollment in US public higher education // Economics of Education Review. 2002. No. 21. Pp. 101-110.

11. Impact of the economic crisis on European universities. European University Association. January 2011. URL: http://www.eua.be/Libraries/Newsletter/Economic_monitoringJanuary2011final.sflb.ashx (дата обращения: 22.07.2015).

12. Barro R. J. Economic growth in a cross section of countries // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991. Vol. 106. No. 2. Pp. 407-443.

13. Корицкий А. В. Человеческий капитал как фактор экономического роста регионов России. Новосибирск: Сибирский университет потребительской кооперации, 2010. 368 с.

14. Тенденции изменения общественного спроса на высшее образование в современной России / И. В. Абанкина, Т. В. Абанкина, Л. М. Филатова, Е. А. Николаенко // Вопросы образования. 2012. № 3. С. 88-112.

15. Abankina I., Abankina T., Filatova L., Nikolayenko E., Seroshtan E. The effects of reform on the performance of higher education institutions // Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2012. Vol. 4. No. 1. Pp. 23-41.

16. Abankina I. V., Aleskerov F. T., Belousova V., Gokhberg L., Zinkovsky K., Kiselgof S. G., Petrushchenko S., Shvydun S. V. Performance-Based Typology Of Universities: Evidence From Russia // Working papers by NRU Higher School of Economics. Series WP BRP «Science, Technology and Innovation». 2015. No. WP BRP 33/STI/2015.

17. Модель многоступенчатого выбора для прогнозирования поведения спроса на высшее образование / И. В. Абанкина, Т. В. Абанкина, Ф. Т. Алескеров, К. В. Зиньковский, Д. Л. Огороднийчук, Л. М. Филатова, П. В. Деркачев, Е. А. Николаенко, Э. С. Сероштан, Л. Г. Егорова // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2014. № 4-5 (92-93). С. 84-94.

18. Carnoy M., Loyalka P., Dobryakova M. S., Dossani R., Froumin I., Kuhns K., Tilak J. B., Rong W. University Expansion in a Changing Global Economy: Triumph of the BRICs? Stanford University Press. Stanford. CA. 2013. 404 p.

19. Abankina I. V., Scherbakova I. Russian Higher Education Reforms and the Bologna Process // Journal of the European Higher Education Area. 2013. No. 3. Pp. 3-25.

20. Abankina I. V, Filatova L. Sustaining Student Enrolment: Impact of Demand Trends for Higher Education in Russia // Journal of US-China Public Administration. 2015. Vol. 12. No. 5. Pp. 345-359.

21. Абанкина И. Тенденции общественного спроса на образование в России // Федеральный справочник. Образование в России. Т. 9. М.: Издательский центр «Президент», 2013. С. 69-77.

22. Abankina I., Abankina T., Filatova L., Nikolayenko E. Education Development Trends in Russia // Journal of US-China Public Administration. 2012. Vol. 9. No. 10. Pp. 1198-1214.


Review

For citations:


Abankina I.V., Abankina T.V., Filatova L.M. THE PITFALLS OF DIFFERENTIATION IN THE FINANCING OF RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES. Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2016;10(2):38-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.2.38-58. EDN: VZKDFZ

Views: 273


ISSN 2782-2923 (Print)