QUALITY OF THE RUSSIAN LEGISLATION AS A KEY TO INCREASING ITS EFFICIENCY

Objective: to analyze the influence of the Russian legislation quality on its effectiveness.Methods: systemic and functional approaches, logical methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction, generalization, as well as specific-scientific methods. In particular, logical research methods were used for analysis and design of theoretical definitions of quality and efficiency of the current legislation. The systematic approach was used to analyze the main features of the structure of the current legislation, acting as one of the objects of legal processes, as well as to determine the parameters of the quality of legislation. The functional approach was used to analyze the function of current legislation and identify the key performance parameters. Mathematical methods were used to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the current legislation.Results: basing on the analysis of the current legislation, a number of its quality characteristics were revealed that enhance its effectiveness. These are, in particular, such parameters as the specificity of legal norms, their validity, account of the interests of participants of social relations regulated by the rule of law, freedom of the legal entities, the systemic character and stability of the current legislation. The key performance aspects of current legislation are highlighted, which include: effectiveness of the current legislation implementation, legal regulation of social relations, changes in the existing legislation, enforcement of legal norms.In the course of the study, it was shown that the quality of the current legislation largely determines its effectiveness.Scientific novelty: the concept of current legislation quality influence on its effectiveness was proposed, the key ways to improve the quality of legislation in Russia are outlined, as well as the ways to improve its effectiveness basing on analysis of legal regulation patterns and requirements imposed to it. In particular, the method of calculating the efficiency of legislative norms is proposed taking into account their quality. The key performance aspects of current legislation are highlighted, which include: effectiveness of the current legislation implementation, legal regulation of social relations, changes in the existing legislation, enforcement of legal norms. The survey also highlighted the main parameters influencing the quality of current legislation and their impact on its effectiveness. Practical significance: the main findings of the study, concerning the quality of current legislation, can be used as a basis for further research, as well as in law-making activities during the development and adoption of normative legal acts.

Theory and history of law and state, Quality of legislation, Activities, Effectiveness of legislation, Law-making, Legal regulation, Implementation of law, Legal system

1. Горшенков Г. Н. Эффективность антикоррупционной политики // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2016. № 1. С. 5-16.

2. Сырых В. М. Логические основания общей теории государства и права. В 3 т. Т. 2. М.: Юстинформцентр, 2004. 560 с.

3. Эффективность правовых норм / В. В. Глазырин, В. Н. Кудрявцев, В. И. Никитинский, И. С. Самощенко. М.: Юрид. лит., 1980. 280 c.

4. Гаврилов О. А. Математические методы и модели в социально-правовом исследовании / отв. ред. Г. Г. Зуйков. М.: Наука, 1980. 183 c.

5. Ik-Whan G. Kwon, Daniel W. Baack. The Effectiveness of Legislation Controlling Gun Usage: A Holistic Measure of Gun Control Legislation // The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Vol. 64. No. 2 (Apr., 2005). Pp. 533-547.

6. Rani S. The Role and Efficacy of Legislation // The Loophole - November 2011. URL: https://www.opc.gov.au/calc/docs/ Loophole_papers/Rani_Nov2011.pdf Ensuring standards in the quality of legislation First Report of Session 2013-14/ (дата обращения: 10.05.2015).

7. Миннебаев Р. Х. Теоретические проблемы оптимизации фактических составов: дис.. канд. юрид. наук. Н. Новгород, 2011. 33 с.

8. Ребрин Ю. И. Управление качеством. Таганрог: Изд-во ТРТУ, 2004. 174 с.

9. Maclean W. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, 1996.

10. Осипов М. Ю. Понятие эффективности правовых процессов и проблемы ее определения // Ленинградский юридический журнал. 2009. № 3 (17). С. 28-34.

11. Осипов М. Ю., Соловьев А. Ю. Понятие и особенности влияния правового регулирования на организацию и жизнедеятельность современного общества // Вестник Владимирского юридического института. 2009. № 4 (13). С. 113-115.

12. Ik-Whan G. Kwon and Daniel W. Baack The Effectiveness of Legislation Controlling Gun Usage: A Holistic Measure of Gun Control Legislation // The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Vol. 64. No. 2 (Apr., 2005). Pp. 533-547.

13. Trimboli L., Bonney R. An Evaluation of the NSW Apprehended Violence Order Scheme. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, 1997.

14. Абрамова А. А. Качество нормы права как критерий эффективности механизма правового регулирования // Источники права: проблемы теории и практики: материалы конференции 22-25 мая 2007 г. М.: РАП, 2008. С. 280-285.

15. Wallace A., Homicide: The Social Reality. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, 1986.

16. Nicastro A. M., Cousins A. V., Spitzberg B. H. The tactical face of stalking // Journal of Criminal Justice. 2000. Vol. 28. № 1. Pp. 69-82.

17. Калинин А. Ю. Правообразование в России. Понятийно-категориальный и структурно-функциональный состав (историко-теоретическое исследование): дис. … докт. юрид. наук. СПб., 2010.

18. Алмаева (Иванова) Ю. О. Соотношение эффективности и качества правовых норм // Юридическая наука и практика: история и современность: сборник материалов I Международной научно-практ. конференции, 5 июня 2013 г. Вып. 1. Рязань: Концепция, 2013. С. 8-11.

19. Осипова С. А. Наводнение норм - фактор, влияющий на качество правовых норм // Правовые традиции. Жидковские чтения: материалы Международной научной конференции. Москва, 29-30 марта 2013 г. М.: РУДН, 2014. С. 424-433.

20. Зенин С. С. К постановке вопроса о качестве юридической техники правовых норм, определяющих субъекты публичных слушаний // Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2009. № 1 (10). С. 122-126.