FEATURES AND PROSPECTS OF JURIDICAL PREDICTING OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY

Objective: to identify characteristics and prospects of predicting the business activity.Methods: historical, sociological, logical, systematic-structural, formal-legal, comparative-legal, legal modeling method.Results: in article suggests the legal definition of prediction of business activity as a scientific and practical study aimed at the determination of the future state and prospects of development of business activity, consisting of the evaluation of legal regulation and analysis of the prospects of further socio-economic development, which aims to select the optimal solution for the further development of entrepreneurship through legal regulators. The work proves the necessity of achieving a balanced legal regulation of social relations by changing the legislation in the field of business agreements, investment and innovation.Scientific novelty: the article for the first time formulates the concept, characteristics and features of legal prediction of business activity, substantiates the impact of predicting on the development of legal regulation of social relations.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in research and teaching while considering the issues of predicting both the socio-economic processes in general and business activity in particular.

Civil law, Legal predicting, Business activity, Planning, Self-regulation, Government regulation, Risk, Management

1. Belykh V. S. On conceptual approaches in legal regulation of entrepreneurial activity // Russian law: theory and practice. 2010. № 2. Pp. 25-34.

2. International Economic Law. Basic Documents. Second Edition / ed. by Ph. Kunig, N. Lau, W. Meng. Berlin; New York, 1993. 834 p.

3. Belykh V. S. Economy and law: major models of correlation // Russian law: theory and practice. 2016. № 1. Pp. 27-38.

4. Сафаров Р. А. Прогнозирование и юридическая наука // Советское государство и право. 1969. № 3. С. 93-102.

5. Austin J. Projecting the future of corrections // Crime and Delinquency. 1992. V. 38, № 3. Pp. 285-308.

6. Клейменов М. П. Уголовно-правовое прогнозирование. Томск: Изд-во Томcкого ун-та, 1991. 169 с.

7. Бестужев-Лада И. В., Наместникова Г. А. Социальное прогнозирование. Курс лекций. М.: Педагогическое общество России, 2002. 392 с.

8. Kuratko Donald F. Entrepreneurial Leadership in the 21st Century // Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. 2007. Vol. 13, № 4. Рp. 1-11.

9. Гаврилов О. А. Стратегия правотворчества и социальное прогнозирование. М.: Институт государства и права РАН, 1993. 128 с.

10. Агамиров К. В. Проблемы юридического прогнозирования: методология, теория, практика. М.: ЮРКОМПАНИ, 2015. 408 с.

11. Тихомиров Ю. А. Оптимизация правового регулирования в контексте социально-экономического развития // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2015. № 1. С. 108-113.

12. Шаргородский М. Д. Прогноз и правовая наука // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 1971. № 1. С. 40-50.

13. Posner R. A. Economic analysis of law. 6th edition. New York: ASPEN Publishers, 2003. 747 p.

14. Рубцова Н. В. Предпринимательская деятельность: понятие, общая характеристика, рисковый характер (к вопросу о дискуссии) // Ученые записки юридического факультета. 2015. № 39 (49). С. 28-32.

15. Калигин Н. А. Принципы организационного управления. М.: Финансы и статистика, 2003. 272 с.

16. Bailey Kenneth D. Sociology and the New Systems Theory: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1994. 372 p.

17. Алексеев С. С. Право: азбука - теория - философия: Опыт комплексного исследования. М.: Статут, 1999. 712 с.

18. Weigel W. Economics of the law: a primer. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2008. 231 p.

19. Shishkin S. N. Legal fundamentals of the state regulation of economy // Russian law: theory and practice. 2013. № 2. Pp. 15-22.

20. Cherian J. Investment Contracts and Arbitration: the World Bank Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes. Leiden, 1975. 198 p.