Review of the monograph “O. Yu. Dyagel. Analytical procedures of anticrisis management: monograph. Krasnoyarsk: Sibirial Federal University, 2020. 268 p.”.

Objective: to conduct a detailed and complete analysis of a monograph by O. Yu. Dyagel2, which is devoted to the study of a wide range of issues related to analytical procedures of crisis management.

Methods: the basic techniques of the abstract-logical method were used (analysis and synthesis, analogy, generalization, comparison, transition from abstract to concrete, etc.).

Results: the leading line of this work is the differentiation of analytical procedures for crisis management, which implies a further standardization of individual diagnostics of enterprises’ financial condition. The reviewers emphasize the importance of the approaches to diagnosing the enterprises’ financial insolvency, systematized in the monograph.

The reviewers assess the grouping of the author's approaches in the implementation of analytical procedures for crisis management, starting with preventive crisis management and ending with arbitration management.

Scientific novelty: a new promising direction of financial analysis has been identified: standardization of an individual financial analysis based on specific groups of financial indicators suitable for a specific enterprise and its situation.

Practical significance: the reviewers concluded that O. Yu. Dyagel’s monographic study contains examples of the practical application of the theoretical, methodological and regulatory approaches studied by the author, which significantly increases the possibility of their application in practice.

1. Vasil'eva, L. S., Petrovskaya, M. V. (2006). Financial analysis. Moscow, Knorus (in Russ.).

2. Ryakhovskaya, A. N. (2018). Theory of anticrisis management. Moscow, Magistr: INFRA-M (in Russ.).

3. Manushin D. V. (2015). Refinement of the concept of methodology. Finance and Credit, 41, 50–66 (in Russ.).

4. Manushin, D. V. (2018). Specifying the notion and structure of methodology of anti-crisis management and the methodology of anti-crisis management of macroeconomy. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 12 (2), 266–299 (in Russ.). http://dx.doi. org/10.21202/1993-047X.12.2018.2.266-299

5. Manushin, D. V. (2018). Specifying the notion and structure of methodology of anti-crisis management and the methodology of anti-crisis management of macroeconomy. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 12 (2), 266–299 (in Russ.). DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.12.2018.2.266-299

6. Buranova, E. A. (2016). About the anti-crisis enterprise management. Society and Economy, 8, 111–133 (in Russ.).

7. Buranova, E. A. (2019). Conceptual model of the process of rehabilitating institutional anti-crisis management of enterprises, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 13 (1), 948–965 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.1.948-965

8. Ryakhovskaya, A. N., Kovan, S. E. (2021). Anticrisis management as the basis for forming the mechanism of a business sustainable development, monograph. Moscow, INFRA-M (in Russ.).

9. Manushin, D. V., Kramin, T. V. (2005). Improving the methods for assessing the bankruptcy probability. Ekonomicheskii vestnik Respubliki Tatarstan, 2–3, 70–72 (in Russ.).

10. Davydova, G. V., Belikov, A. Yu. (1999). Methodology of quantitative assessment of enterprises bankruptcy risk. Upravlenie riskom, 3, 13–20 (in Russ.).

11. Sukhova, L. F. (2003). Practicum of analysis of a financial condition and assessment of credit capacity of a bank-borrower, Moscow, Finansy i statistika (in Russ.).

12. Kulikov, S. V. (2006). Financial analysis of insurance organizations, Rostov on Don, Feniks; Novosibirsk, Sibirskoe soglashenie (in Russ.).