Critical analysis and assessment of prospects of development of a tax for digital services

Objective: to critically analyze the international experience and proposals of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on the international unification of the digital tax and assess the prospects for the development of this sector of the economy, identify bottlenecks and prospects for the introduction of a similar tax in the Russian Federation.

Methods: a dialectical approach to the cognition of economic regularities, which allows analyzing their development and functioning in the context of a set of objective factors, which determined the choice of the following research methods: formal-logical, economic analysis of the main trends in the construction and development of digital taxation, internal and external tax control.

Results: the article discusses the current problems, foreign experience and prospects for the transition of states to the introduction of a new indirect tax – a tax on digital services. Forecasts of growth of tax revenues from digital business have been confirmed. The authors identify two trends in the international practice of digital tax development. The main methodological problems of the new tax are outlined, including the preservation of the neutrality principle, the single tax burden, the identification of the users’ location, the determination of income sources. The risks of a significant increase in the tax burden for companies and users, complication of transaction reporting systems, etc. are identified. The allocation of a tax on digital services in the Russian Federation as an independent tax is justified. The positive effect for the state and the Russian market of digital services is indicated.

Scientific novelty: the paper summarizes the foreign experience of electronic economy taxation, for the first time justifies the need to adapt the national version of the digital tax, taking into account the peculiarity of the modern political and economic situation; despite the Russian support of the OECD directive, the conclusion is made about the need to segment support for the web economy with an alternative in the form of penalties for abuse in this sphere. This approach can be used as a potential opportunity to protect the national digital services market from international competition and pressure.

Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, pedagogical and law enforcement activities when considering issues related to the management of the digital economy, ensuring fairness and neutrality of taxation.

1. Review: IT market: results of 2020. https://www.cnews.ru/reviews/rynok_it_itogi_2020/articles/vyruchka_uchastnikov_rejtinga_cnews100/

2. On adopting the informatization plan of the Ministry of Digital Development, Communication and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation for 2020 and the planning period of 2021 and 2022: Order of the Ministry of Digital Development, Communication and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2019 no. 922. SPS “ConsultantPlyus”.

3. Digital tax: what is it and how it works. (2021, September 18). PaySpaceMagazine. https://payspacemagazine.com/tech/digital-tax-explained/

4. Krasnobaeva, A. M. (2021). Regulations of digital tax: on taxation of revenues from digital services. Finansy, 3, 59–63 (in Russ.).

5. Tyutyuryukov, V. N. (2021). Taxation of bloggers’ revenues. Finansy, 5, 44–49 (in Russ.).

6. Chebanova, E. A. (2020). Current legal and practical issues of the introduced special tax regime "tax on professional income". Zakon i Pravo, 1, 58–62 (in Russ.).

7. Peresypkina, E. I. (2020). Experimental legal regimes in the sphere of digital technologies. Uslugi Svyazi: Bukhgalterskii Uchet i Nalogooblozhenie, 5, 54–64 (in Russ.).

8. Ministry of Communication told how much Russian bloggers earn. (2018, August 18). TASS. (in Russ.). https://tass.ru/obschestvo/5384295

9. Sobchak and instamoms: 15 bloggers earning the most in Instagram. (2020. 26 August). (in Russ.). https://www.forbes.ru/milliardery-photogallery/407587-sobchak-i-insta-mamy-15-blogerov-kotorye-zarabatyvayut-bolshe-vseh-v

10. Main directions of budget, taxation and customs-tariff policy for 2020 and the planning period of 2021 and 2022 (in Russ.). https://www.cnews.ru/reviews/rynok_it_itogi_2020/articles/vyruchka_uchastnikov_rejtinga_cnews100

11. Kudryashova, E. V. (2021). Digital taxes or a new architecture of international taxation? Nalogi, 4, 37–40 (in Russ.).

12. Kazachkova, Z. M., Kazachkov, V. A. (2020). Digital economy and taxes: issues, solutions, prospects. Nalogi, 5, 3–6 (in Russ.). 13. Chand, V., Vilaseca, C. (2022). The UN Proposal on Automated Digital Services: Is It in the Interest of Developing Countries?

13. Kluwer International Tax Blog. http://kluwertaxblog.com/2021/ОЗ/05/themn-proposal-on-automated-digital-services-is-it-in-the-interest-of-developing-ountries/?output=pdf

14. Elliffe, Craig (2021). Taxing the Digital Economy: theory, policy and practice. Cambridge Tax Law Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15. Velikorossov, V. V., Filin, S. A., Kalinina, O. N. (2020). Digital economy: A terminology retrospective, the present and the future. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 19 (4), 707–721 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.19.4.707

16. Report by A. L. Overchuk at the session “Digital challenges for the taxation system” at the 11th Gaydar Forum in RANEPA. 16.01.2020 (in Russ.). https://gaidarforum.ru/news/tsifrovye-vyzovy-dlya-nalogovoy-sistemy/

17. Market of internet trade in Russia grew by over 50 % in a year (in Russ.). https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/news/2022/03/22/914638-rinok-internet-torgovli-v-rossii-za-2021-god-viros-v-poltora-raza

18. Digital tax in Russia: prospects of introduction (in Russ.). https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/5ef/5ef5a7831553dc062605b281a53e4350.pdf

19. OECD Interim Report. 2021. Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-global-anti-base-erosion-model-rules-pillar-two.pdf

20. Ncess-Schmidt, H. S., Marquart, G., Sorensen, P. The Impact of an EU Digital Service Tax on German Businesses. https://www.copenhageneconomics.com/dyn/resources.pdf

21. The Hungarian version of digital tax has been ineffective so far. https://demnet.hu/en/hungarian-digital-tax-has-been-ineffective-so-far/

22. Official site OECD. https://www.quora.com/What-are-OECM-sites

23. OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting – OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264202719-en

24. Milogolov, N. S., Ponomareva, K. A. (2021). International cooperation of tax administrations in taxing digital business models: myth or reality? Nalogi, 3, 29–33 (in Russ.).

25. Shmidt, O. Laid upon. What is the global tax for corporations. Sovkomblog (in Russ.). https://sovcombank.ru/blog/biznesu/oblozhili-so-vseh-storon-chto-takoe-globalnii-nalog-dlya-korporatsii

26. On the activity of foreign persons in the information-telecommunication network “the Internet” on the territory of the Russian Federation. Federal Law no. 236-FZ of June 17, 2021. SPS “ConsultantPlyus” (in Russ.). http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_388781/

27. Kormann, M. Digital taxation bites: report at the World Economic forum in Davos, Switzerland (in Russ.). https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4d048c31-2b26-4327-bcd0-bd7df982b7c5