Milestones for changing the model of scientific-technological development of Russia and overcoming the crisis, by Academician D. S. Lvov

Objective: to determine the vector of changes for Russia’s recovery from the crisis and transformation of the innovation model in the context of trends of the 4^th scientific and technological revolution. To this end, it is necessary to identify internal systemic problems that have worsened under the influence of sanctions and hinder the country’s scientific and technological development.

Methods: the system analysis of phenomena and processes in the scientific, technological and socio-economic spheres is based on the methodological approach by Academician D. S. Lvov to the study of Russia under reforms as a precursor of the systemic economic paradigm developed under the guidance of G. B. Kleyner, a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Results: a decline in the economy, science and social sphere has been revealed, as was predicted by Academician D. S. Lvov, in case the problems of the transition period are not solved. The essential obstacles are revealed, which hinder both the country leaving the bifurcation point and economic growth based on intellectual factors and advanced technologies. Statistics are presented demonstrating the obsolescence of industrial equipment, the reduced investment in the knowledge economy, the stagnation of innovative activity of organizations, and the worsening social imbalances. Based on the analysis results, the conclusions of D. S. Lvov and other scientists and specialists, guidelines are proposed for changing the model of scientific and technological development; the leading directions for changing the state policy are given. Conclusions and recommendations refer to the fundamental factors not only of the model of scientific and technological development, but also of the economic model as a whole.

Scientific novelty: consists in a new format of an approach to the formulation of the problem of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation and its solution through the prism of D. S. Lvov’s scientific heritage. Provisions of his teaching are actualized and their relevance for contemporary еconomy is substantiated in relation to identifying a crisis situation similar to the current one in scale and influence, as well as to determining the ways out of the crisis.

Practical significance: the results of the study can become the basis for expanding the system of knowledge within the problem of scientific and technological development, as well as be used in the practical activities of public authorities to develop solutions for crisis management of the economy.

1. Varshavsky, A. E. (2021). The need to restore an indicative planning system – applying the experience of developing a complex program of scientific-technical progress. In Planning in market economy: reminiscences of the future (pp. 220–229). Saint Petersburg: Institute for New Industrial Development named after S.Yu. Witte. (In Russ.).

2. Whitten, R., Blanquart, J., Mays, L. C., & Merchant, F. K. (2022). Russian Risk: Transactions with Russian Banks and Exports to Russia Create Greatest Exposure under New U.S. Ukraine-Related Sanctions. National Law Review, XII(56). https:// www.natlawreview.com/article/russian-risk-transactions-russian-banks-and-exports-to-russia-create-greatest

3. Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0. A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629.

4. Lvov, D. S. (1999). The future of the Russian economy. Economic manifesto. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 3, 5–31. (In Russ.).

5. Lvov, D. S. (1990). Effective management of technical development. Мoscow: Economica. (In Russ.).

6. Lvov, D. S., Glazyev, S. Yu., & Fetisov, G. G. (1992). Evolution of technical-economic systems: opportunities and boundaries of centralized regulation. Мoscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).

7. Mohd Mudzar, N. M., Chew, K. W. (2022). Change in Labour Force Skillset for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Literature Review. International Journal of Technology, 13(5), 969. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i5.5875

8. Shpak, V. V. (2021). Forming an organizational-managerial model of implementation of the “Strategy of development of the electronics industry of the Russian Federation up to 2030”. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 3(449). Economic sciences, 72, 10–23 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2021-10302

9. Lvov, D. S. (2007). New industrial policy of Russia. Economic Science of Contemporary Russia, 3, 9–12. (In Russ.).

10. Varshavsky, A. E. (2020). Topical issues of reindustrialization and import substitution. In S. D. Bodrunov (Ed.). Production, science and education in the epoch of transformations: Russia in the [de]globalizing world (PNO-VI): collection of works of the 6th International Congress (pp. 133–146). Saint Petersburg: Institute for New Industrial Development named after S. Yu. Witte. (In Russ.).

11. Komkov, N. I., Usmanova, T. Kh., & Sutyagin, V. V. (2021). Technology Modernization Opportunities in the Russian Economy. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, 6(189), 84–94. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-189-84-94

12. Tolkachev, S. A. (2020). Structural changes in the Russian industry in the “five-year period of sanctions”. In A. V. Bystrov (Ed.). Problems and prospects of the Russian industry development. Collection of works of the 7th International scientific-practical conference “Industry of Russia through the prism of national projects” (pp. 341–348). Moscow: RUSAYNS. (In Russ.).

13. Tolkachev, S. A., & Teplyakov, A. Y. (2021). National industrial competency and global cost chains: methodological tools of macroeconomic analysis. Economic Revival of Russia, 2(68), 40–52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2021-268-40-52

14. Frolov, I. E. (2019). Assessment of the development of the Russia high-technology complex under low inflation and limited state support. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, 4, 3–15. (In Russ.).

15. Aganbegyan, A. G. (2017). Investments into capital assets and into human capital – two interrelated sources of socialeconomic growth. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, 3, 17–22. (In Russ.).

16. Varshavsky, A. E. (2020). Excessive inequality: problems and risks. In S. D. Bodrunov, A. V. Buzgalin (Eds.). Economy as an object of interdisciplinary research: collection of works of the 4th International Congress for political economy (MPEK-IV) (pp. 42–55). Moscow: Cultural Revolution. (In Russ.).

17. Glazyev, S. Y. (2022). Human potential as the main factor of economic growth in the new global economic order. Scientific Works оf the Free Economic Society of Russia, 238(6), 157–164. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2022-238-6-157-164

18. Lvov, D. S. (2003). Prospects of longterm social-economic development of Russia. Report at the Presidium of RAS. Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk, 73(8), 675–697. (In Russ.).

19. Lvov, D. S. (2003). What economy does Russia need?. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 1(20), 5–17. (In Russ.).

20. Glaziev, S. Y. (2021). On the mechanismso f realizingthe goalsof Russia’s nationald evelopmentin the context of changing- technologicalandw orld economics tructures. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 230(4), 66–70. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2021-230-4-66-70

21. Polterovich, V. M. (2007). On the strategy of catching-up development for Russia. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 3, 17–23. (In Russ.).

22. Ivanov, V. V. (2022). Globalization 4.0: Background and Outcomes. Voprosy Filosofii, 8, 195–200. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-8-195-200

23. Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2, 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785

24. Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. SSRN, November. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.617544

25. Rodrik, D. (2013). Unconditional Convergence in Manufacturing. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 165–204.

26. Rodrik, D. (2018). New Technologies, Global Value Chains, and the Developing Economies. Pathways for Prosperity Commission Background Paper Series, 1. Oxford, United Kingdom: University of Oxford.

27. Belousov, D. R., Frolov, I. E. (Eds.). (2022). On the Long-Term Scientific and Technological Development of Russia: monograph. Moscow: Dynamic print, 2022.

28. Kleiner, G. B. (2021). Systemic economy: steps of development. Moscow: Nauchnaya biblioteka.

29. Toffler, A. (2004). Future shock. Moscow: Izdatelstvo AST. (In Russ.).

30. Fomin, D. A., Khanin, G. I. (2017). Dynamics of capital assets in the Russian economy in post-Soviet period (1992–2015). Problemy Prognozirovaniya, 4, 21–32. (In Russ.).

31. Dynkin, A. A., Rekitar, Ya. A., & Kurenkov, Yu.V. (Eds.). (2000). Investments in Russia: trends, problems, was of solution taking into account foreign practice. Moscow: IMEMO RAN. (In Russ.).

32. Lvov, D. S. (2001). Russian economy: breakthrough into the 21st century. Problemy Teorii i Praktiki Upravleniya, 4. (In Russ.).

33. Krasilnikova, E. V., & Nikonova, A. A. (2020). Results of executing the first stage of the scientific-technological strategy of Russia. In Startegic planning and development of enterprises. Collection of reports of the participants of section meetings of the 21st All-Russia symposium. Moscow, November 10–11, 2020. Section 5 (pp. 695–699). Moscow: CEMI RAS. (In Russ.).

34. Lvov, D. S. (2004). Management of scientific-technical development. International Journal of Management Theory and Practice, 3, 59–65. (In Russ.).

35. Blank, R. (2021, October 1). For a Competitive Economy, We Need a Skilled Workforce. Issues in Science and Technology. https://issues.org/competitive-economy-skilled-workforce-blank/

36. Mincer, J., & Higuchi, Y. (1988). Wage structures and labor turnover in the United States and Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2, 97–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-1583(88)90017-2

37. Rabiul, I. M., Ang, J. B., & Madsen, J. B. (2014). Quality-Adjusted Human Capital and Productivity Growth. Economic Inquiry, 52(2), 757–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12052

38. Walker, I., & Zhu, Y. (2013, October 10). The Benefit of STEM Skills to Individuals, Society, and the Economy. Report to Royal Society’s Vision for Science and Mathematics. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/education/policy/vision/reports/ev-9-visionresearch-report-20140624.pdf

39. Yusnandar, Y., Masbar, R., Nazamuddin, B. S., & Jamal, A. (2019). High-skilled Workforce and Productivity Growth: the Knowledge-based Economics Perspective. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research: Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018), 292. https://doi.org/10.2991/agc-18.2019.81

40. Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review, 93(10), 96–114.

41. Frank, A., Dalenogare, L., & Ayala, N. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004

42. Enrique, D. V., Ayala, N. F., Lima, M. J. D. R. F., Marodin, G. A., Gzara, L., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The use of ICT tools to support collaborative product development activities: evidences from Brazilian industry. Production, 28, e20170099. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20170099

43. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.

44. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.

45. Lvov, D. S. (2002). Russian economy – a way to the 21st century. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie reformy: regional'nyi aspekt, 4, 3–5. (In Russ.).