Preview

Russian Journal of Economics and Law

Advanced search

Impact of cross-border data flows on goods and services flows in international trade

https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.548-570

EDN: AULLII

Abstract

Objective: to assess the impact of cross-border data flows on imports and exports.

Methods: static panel data models, graphical method.

Results: the paper shows that currently the issues of the digitalization impact on economic processes are insufficiently studied from an empirical point of view, and the conclusions obtained by the researchers are quite contradictory. To assess the impact of digitalization, the authors formed a model with fixed effects, the variables of which are indicators of exports and imports of goods and services of geographical macro-regions, the use of international bandwidth, oil rents, investment indicators, etc. The main conclusion is that the use of international data transmission channels has a statistically significant effect on export and import flows. Modeling in terms of geographical macro-regions showed that the impact of international data flows on export and import flows was uneven.

Scientific novelty: the negative impact of international data flows on exports in Latin America and the Caribbean and imports in Europe and Central Asia, East Asia and the Pacific is shown. A quantitative assessment of the impact of cross-border data flows on international trade flows gives grounds to assert the ambiguous consequences of digital transformation in relation to international trade for certain geographical macro-regions.

Practical significance: conclusions based on the study results can become the basis for assessing the consequences of measures aimed at increasing the country’s involvement in the globalization and digitalization processes. The study results can also be used to further assess the impact of international data flows on international trade indicators during external shocks and to determine the specifics of this relationship during increased macroeconomic instability and risk.

About the Authors

J. A. Varlamova
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Russian Federation

Julia A. Varlamova, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Theory and Econometrics, Institute for Management, Economy and Finance, Senior Researcher of Scirentific center for researching the problems of market relations development under globalization of the world economy

Web of Science Researcher ID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/J-5897-2016 
eLIBRARY ID: AuthorID: 640371

Kazan



O. A. Podkorytova
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Olga A. Podkorytova, Candidate of Physico-Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Cybernetics, Research Fellow of Center for econometrics and business analytics

Web of Science Researcher ID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-9900-2013 
eLIBRARY ID: AuthorID: 102495

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Abeliansky, A. L., & Hilbert, M. (2017). Digital technology and international trade: Is it the quantity of subscriptions or the quality of data speed that matters? Telecommunications Policy, 41(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.11.001

2. Baldwin, R. (2016). The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674972667

3. Barbero, J., & Rodriguez-Crespo, E. (2018). The effect of broadband on European Union trade: A regional spatial approach. World Economy, 41, 2895–2913. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12723

4. Cariolle, J., Imbruno, M., & de Melo, J. (2020). Bilateral digital connectivity and firm participation in export markets. (Working paper). https://hal.science/hal-03182438/document

5. Ching, N. T., Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Maroufkhani, P., & Asadi, Sh. (2022). Industry 4.0 applications for sustainable manufacturing: A systematic literature review and a roadmap to sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 334, 130133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130133

6. Choi, V. (2010). The effect of the Internet on service trade. Economics Letters, 109(2), 102–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.08.005

7. Ciuriak, D., & Ptashkina, M. (2018). The Digital Transformation and the Transformation of International Trade. RTA Exchange. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3107811

8. Ditzen, J. (2016). XTCD2: Stata module to test for weak cross-sectional dependence. Statistical Software Components S458204a, Boston College Department of Economics. Revised 15 May 2023. https://seec.hw.ac.uk/images/discussionpapers/SEEC_DiscussionPaper_No8.pdf

9. Driscoll, J., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825

10. Ericsson. (2022). Ericsson Mobility Report. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Stockholm, November. https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/mobility-report

11. Fan, X. (2021). Digital Economy Development, International Trade Efficiency and Trade Uncertainty. China Finance and Economic Review, 10(3), 89–110.

12. Foster, C., Graham, M., Mann, L., Waema, T., & Friederici, N. (2018). Digital control in value chains: Challenges of connectivity for east african firms. Economic Geography, 94(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1350104

13. Freund, C. L., & Weinhold D. (2004). The effect of the Internet on international trade. Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00059-X

14. Gnangnon, S. K. (2020). Effect of the Internet on Services Export Diversification. Journal of Economic Integration, 35(3), 519–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26927877

15. Goldfarb,A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452

16. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282804322970814

17. Imasheva, I. Yu., & Kramin, T. V. (2022). Digital inequality: modernization of Kuznets curve in the digital era. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 16(4), 716–727. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2022.4.716-727

18. ITU. (2022). Measuring digital development. Facts and Figures 2022. International Telecommunication Union, Telecommunication Development Bureau, Place des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland.

19. ITU. (2023a). Core ICT Indicators. https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/partnership/material/CoreICTIndicators.pdf

20. ITU. (2023b). ITU Facts and Figures 2022. https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/ituint/viz/ITUFactsandFigures2022/Bandwidth01

21. ITU. (2023c). History of the ICT Development Index (IDI). https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/IDI/history.aspx

22. ITU. (2023d). DataHub. https://datahub.itu.int/indicators/

23. ITU. (2023e). Measuring digital development. Facts and Figures: Focus on Least Developed Countries. March 2023. International Telecommunication Union. Telecommunication Development Sector.

24. Ivanov, D. V., Asochakov, Yu. V., & Bogomiagkova, E. S. (2021). Inclusion in the Internet Communications and Creativity on Social Networking Platforms as Indicators of Social Development. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoy Antropologii (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology), 24(2), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2021.24.2.3

25. Imasheva, I. Yu., & Kramin, T. V. (2022).Digital inequality: modernization of Kuznets curve in the digital era. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 16(4), 716–727. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2022.4.716-727

26. Juodis, A., & Reese, S. (2022). The Incidental Parameters Problem in Testing for Remaining Cross-Section Correlation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 40(3), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2021.1906687

27. Kadochnikova, E. I. (2020). Convergence of economic growth and digitalization of households: spatial analysis of interrelation with regional panel data. Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 14(3), 487–507. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21202/1993047X.14.2020.3.487-507

28. Kouladoum, J. C., Wirajing, M. A. K., & Nchofoung, T. N. (2022). Digital technologies and financial inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa. Telecommunications Policy, 46(9), Article 102387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102387

29. Kurihara, Y. (2021). Have IT improvements had positive impacts on international trade? Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 4(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.54392/ajir2141

30. Latif, Z., Yang Mengke, Danish, Latif, S., Ximei, L., Pathan, Z. H., Salam, S., & Jianqiu, Z. (2018). The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization and economic growth: Panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.006

31. Marsh, I. W., Rincon-Aznar, A., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2017). We see ict spillovers everywhere but in the econometric evidence: a reassessment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(6), 1067–1088. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtx008

32. Minaev, S. V. (2014). Global economy: 2012–2013: analytic review. Moscow: RAN, INION, Tsentr nauchno-informatsionnykh issledovanii global'nykh i regional'nykh problem, Otdel Azii i Afriki. (In Russ.).

33. Mu, Y., Chen, Z., Ding, Y., Wang, Y., & Pang, B. (2020). How Internet Promotes China’s Exports: A Firm-Level Perspective. China & World Economy, 28(5), 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12329

34. Nguimkeu, P., & Okou, C. (2021). Leveraging digital technologies to boost productivity in the informal sector in Sub-Saharan Africa. Review of Policy Research, 38(6), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12441

35. Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels. Econometric Reviews, 34(6-10), 1089–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623

36. PwC (2011). The New Digital Economy. How it will transform business. https://www.pwc.com/cl/es/publicaciones/assets/the-new-digital-economy.pdf

37. Ratnikova, T. A. (2006). Introduction to econometric analysis of panel data. The HSE Economic Journal, 2, 267–316. (In Russ.).

38. Rodríguez-Crespo, E., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2019). The effect of ICT on trade: Does product complexity matter? Telematics and Informatics, 41, 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.05.001

39. Rodriguez-Crespo, E., Billon, M., & Marco, R. (2021). Impacts of Internet Use on Trade: New Evidence for Developed and Developing Countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(10), 3017–3032. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1676225

40. Sanderson, L., Wright-McNaughton, G., & Yashiro, N. (2022). Does high-speed internet boost exporting? New Zealand Productivity Commission (Working paper 2022/02). www.productivity.govt.nz/research

41. Schumacher, R. (2013). Deconstructing the theory of comparative advantage. World Social and Economic Review, 2, 83–105.

42. Shvab, K. (2016). Fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russ.).

43. Singh, P., & Maiti, D. (2020). ICT, Access to Finance and Firm Exports: A Cross-Country Study. In D. Maiti, F. Castellacci, & A. Melchior (eds). Digitalisation and Development. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9996-1_6

44. Sun, M. (2021). The Internet and SME Participation in Exports. Information Economics and Policy, 57, Article 100940. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100940

45. Tay, C. (2018). The impact of information and communication technologies on bilateral trade in services. International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics, 9(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOI.2018.088516

46. Visser, R. (2019). The effect of the internet on the margins of trade. Information Economics and Policy, 46, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2018.12.001

47. Wang, M. L., & Choi, C. H. (2019). How information and communication technology affect international trade: a comparative analysis of BRICS countries. Information Technology for Development, 25(3), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1493675

48. World Bank. (2019). World Bank Country and Lending Groups 2019. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups

49. World Bank. (2023). Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/

50. Xie, Y., & Pesaran, M. H. (2022). A Bias-Corrected Cd Test for Error Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel Data Models with Latent Factors. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4198155


Review

For citations:


Varlamova J.A., Podkorytova O.A. Impact of cross-border data flows on goods and services flows in international trade. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2023;17(3):548-570. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.548-570. EDN: AULLII

Views: 494


ISSN 2782-2923 (Print)