Preview

Russian Journal of Economics and Law

Advanced search

The Grass is Always Greener: Analyzing Crime Concentration and Specialization in Urban Greenspace Environs

Ch. Hodgen, K. Wuschke

Translator E. N. Belyaeva

https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.645-666

EDN: LKQOER

Abstract

Objective: to identify the level of crime in urban greenspaces  and their correclation with certain crime types.

Methods: dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors, which predetermined the following research methods: formal-logical and sociological.

Results: greenspaces play an important role in the urban landscape, with prior research suggesting that they are associated with numerous health and social benefits for residents. Despite this, research conflicts regarding the relationship between greenspaces and crime, with some studies finding these locations to be criminogenic and others finding them to be protective against local crime. This study examines this relationship in Portland, Oregon, considering different greenspace types as well as different crime types.

Scientific novelty: this study presents a novel methodological adaption to measure crime concentration and specialization around discrete location types by integrating a street network buffer into the standard Location Quotient (LQ) metric. Results suggest that Portland’s greenspaces as a whole do not experience a concentration of crime; however, varying patterns emerge when examining different greenspace and crime types. This study identifies diverse crime concentrations in proximity to small parks, while finding other greenspace categories to be associated with crime-specific concentrations nearby. Others, still, have lower than expected counts of crime concentrating nearby, potentially demonstrating protective trends. These results highlight the importance of disaggregating both crime and location types to better understand the complex relationship between greenspaces and crime.

Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, pedagogical and law enforcement activities when considering the issues related to minimizing crime on the territory of urban green spaces.

 

The article was first published in English language by Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society and The Western Society of Criminology Hosting by Scholastica. For more information please contact: CCJLS@WesternCriminology.org

For original publication: Hodgen, Ch., & Wuschke, K. (2023). The Grass is Always Greener: Analyzing Crime Concentration and Specialization in Urban Greenspace Environs. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 24(1), 19–37.

Publication URL: https://ccjls.scholasticahq.com/article/73940-the-grass-is-always-greener-analyzing-crime-concentration-andspecialization-in-urban-greenspace-environs

About the Authors

Ch. Hodgen
University of California
United States

Cheyenne Hodgen, M.S., is a PhD student 

Irvine



K. Wuschke
Portland State University
United States

Kathryn Wuschke, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Criminology and Criminal

Portland



References

1. Andresen, M. A., & Linning, S. J. (2012). The (in) appropriateness of aggregating across crime types. Applied Geography, 35(1–2), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.007

2. Andresen, M. A., Linning, S. J., & Malleson, N. (2017). Crime at places and spatial concentrations: Exploring the spatial stability of property crime in Vancouver BC, 2003-2013. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9295-8

3. Andresen, M. A., Wuschke, K., Kinney, J. B., Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (2009). Cartograms, crime and location quotients. Crime Patterns and Analysis, 2(1), 31–46.

4. Bernasco, W., & Block, R. (2011). Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the infl nce of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810384135

5. Boessen, A., & Hipp, J. R. (2018). Parks as crime inhibitors or generators: Examining parks and the role of their nearby context. Social Science Research, 76, 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.ssresearch.2018.08.008

6. Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(3), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006

7. Brantingham, P. L. & Brantingham, P. J. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In P. J. Brantingham, & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 27–54). Sage Publications.

8. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80212-9

9. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02242925

10. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1998). Mapping crime for analytic purposes: location quotients, counts, and rates. In D. Weisburd & T. McEwan (Eds.), Crime mapping and crime prevention (pp. 263–288). Criminal Justice Press.

11. Breetzke, G., Pearson, A., Tao, S., & Zhang, R. (2020). Greenspace and gun violence in Detroit, USA. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 15(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3865608

12. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

13. Drawve, G., & Barnum, J. D. (2018). Place-based risk factors for aggravated assault across police divisions in Little Rock, Arkansas. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2016.1270849

14. Eybergen, C., & Andresen, M. A. (2022). Public parks and crimes of property: get out there and enjoy the sunshine, lock your cars, and hide your bike. Security Journal, 35(3), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00299-x

15. Groff, E., & McCord, E. S. (2011). The role of neighborhood parks as crime generators. Security Journal, 25(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/si.2011.1

16. Hart, T. C., & Miethe, T. D. (2014). Street robbery and public bus stops: A case study of activity nodes and situational risk. Security Journal, 27(2), 180193. https://doi.org/10.1057/si.2014.5

17. Hipp, J. R., Corcoran, J., Wickes, R., & Li, T. (2014). Examining the social porosity of environmental features on neighborhood sociability and attachment. PLoS One, 9, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/iournal.pone.0084544

18. Hodgen, Ch., & Wuschke, K. (2023). The Grass is Always Greener: Analyzing Crime Concentration and Specialization in Urban Greenspace Environs. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 24(1), 19–37.

19. Kimpton, A., Corcoran, J., & Wickes, R. (2017). Greenspace and crime: An analysis of greenspace types, neighboring composition, and the temporal dimensions of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(3), 303–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816666309

20. Mason, S. G. (2010). Can community design build trust? A comparative study of design factors in Boise, Idaho neighborhoods. Cities, 27, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.cities.2010.07.003

21. McCord, E. S., & Houser, K. A. (2017). Neighborhood parks, evidence of guardianship, and crime in two diverse US cities. Security Journal, 30(3), 807824. https://doi.org/10.1057/si.2015.11

22. McCunn, L. J., & Gifford, R. (2014). Interrelations between sense of place, organizational commitment, and green neighborhoods. Cities, 41, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.cities.2014.04.008

23. Openshaw, S. (1984). Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environment and Planning A, 16(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/a160017

24. Oregon Metro. (2022). Regional Land Information System (RLIS) discovery. https://rlisdiscovery.oregonmetro.gov/

25. Portland Parks and Recreation. (2017). Community needs survey results citywide analysis: Comprehensive report. https://www.portland.gov/parks/proiects

26. Portland Parks and Recreation. (2022a). Parks and Recreation. https://www.portland.gov/parks

27. Portland Parks and Recreation. (2022b). Parks Replacement Bond. https://www.portland.gov/parks/parks-replacement-bond

28. Portland Police Bureau. (2022). Crime statistics. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/police/71978

29. PortlandMaps.(2022). Parks. https://gis-pdx.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/PDX::parks/about

30. Ratcliffe, J. H. (2012). The spatial extent of criminogenic places: A changepoint regression of violence around bars. Geographica Analysis, 44(4), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/i.15384632.2012.00856.x

31. Shepley, M., Sachs, N., Sadatsafavi, H., Fournier, C., & Peditto, K. (2019). The impact of greenspace on violent crime in urban environments: An evidence synthesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/iierph16245119

32. Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/i.1745-9125.1989.tb00862.x

33. Taylor, R. B., Haberman, C. P., & Groff, E. R. (2019). Urban park crime: Neighborhood context and park features. Journal of Criminal Justice, 64, 1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.icrimius.2019.101622

34. Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S. M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at place: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/i.1745-9125.2004.tb00521.x

35. Wuschke, K., & Kinney, J. B. (2018). Built environment, land use, and crime. In G. Bruinsma & S. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental criminology (pp. 479–500). Oxford University Press.

36. Wuschke, K., Andresen, M. A., & Brantingham, P. L. (2021). Pathways of crime: Measuring crime concentration along urban roadways. The Canadian Geographer/Le Geographe Canadien, 65(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12676

37. Wuschke, K., Henning, K., & Stewart, G. (2021). Dots versus density: The impact of crime mapping techniques on perception of safety, police performance and neighborhood quality. Policing and Society, 32(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1874950

38. Yang, J., Mcbride, J., Zhou, J., & Sun, Z. (2005). The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 3(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.ufug.2004.09.001


Review

For citations:


Hodgen Ch., Wuschke K. The Grass is Always Greener: Analyzing Crime Concentration and Specialization in Urban Greenspace Environs. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2023;17(3):645-666. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.645-666. EDN: LKQOER

Views: 384


ISSN 2782-2923 (Print)