Ripple effect: the SEC’s major questions doctrine problem
https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.837-872
EDN: AWINLM
Abstract
Objective: to elaborate a new standard for assessing the level of decentralization of cryptoassets in the USA.
Methods: dialectical approach to cognition of social phenomena, allowing to analyze them in historical development and functioning in the context of the totality of objective and subjective factors, which predetermined the following research methods: formal-logical and sociological.
Results: Crypto assets and blockchain technology have the potential to create unprecedented equitable access to financial institutions. Despite this potential, there is a robust debate regarding federal agencies' jurisdiction over the novel asset class. Without clear statutory guidelines, federal agencies have been forced to resolve this debate through the rulemaking process. However, agency rules regarding jurisdiction over crypto assets could be scrutinized by a reviewing court under the major questions doctrine. Once highly deferential to agency rules, the U.S. Supreme Court in recent terms has repeatedly struck down agency rules when an agency claims an unheralded power to regulate an issue of deep economic and political significance. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) arguably claims such a power by interpreting most crypto assets to be "investment contracts" and thus under SEC jurisdiction. But although a decision on major questions doctrine grounds in the high-profile case SEC v. Ripple Labs, Inc. could help clarify how we classify crypto assets, it leaves many jurisdictional questions unanswered and could complicate the application of the SEC's disclosure regime to risky crypto asset offerings.
Scientific novelty: This Note argues that Congress should pass the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act to create joint jurisdiction between the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission over most crypto asset offerings. This may help to balance consumer protection and innovation at the frontier of financial innovation. The author also endorses a new standard to evaluate whether a crypto asset is sufficiently decentralized to further clarify the SEC's role in regulating crypto asset offerings.
Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, pedagogical and law enforcement activities when considering the issues related to the activity of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
About the Author
M. DonovanUnited States
Matt Donovan, J.D. Candidate, Fordham University School of Law; B.A.,
New York
References
1. Brett, J. (2022, May 19). Congress Has Introduced 50 Digital Asset Bills Impacting Regulation, Blockchain, and CBDC Policy. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbrett/2022/05/19/congress-has-introduced-50-digital-asset-bills-impacting-regulationblockchain-and-cbdc-policy/ [https://perma.cc/J8TT-C8CZ].
2. Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. https://ethereum.org/669c9e2e2027310b6b3cdce6e1c52962/Ethereum_Whitepaper_-_Buterin_2014.pdf [https://perma.cc/Q2VK-J9LV]
3. Cecere, J. C. (2021, Apr. 19). Cryptocurrency's Future in the U.S. Is Threatened by SEC Action Against Ripple. Bloomberg L. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/securities-law/cryptocurrencys-future-in-the-u-s-is-threatened-by-sec-action-against-ripple [https://perma.cc/A635-SQEE].
4. Coenen, M., & Davis, S. (2017). Minor Courts, Major Questions. Vand. L. Rev., 70, 777.
5. Clayton, J. (2020, Nov. 2). Statement on Harmonizing, Simplifying and Improving the Exempt Offering Framework; Benefits to Small and Medium-Sized Business and Their Investors. https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/clayton-harmonization-2020-11-2 [https://perma.cc/YLZ3-JP4D].
6. Cohen, L., & Lewin, F. (2022, June 14). RFIA Proposals Introduce Innovative Digital Asset Regulation Through Ancillary Assets. IFLR. https://www.iflr.com/article/2a89wn78h6ljzwr097xts/rfia-proposals-introduce-innovative-digital-asset-regulationthrough-ancillary-assets [https://perma.cc/SP7B-GQEW].
7. Cohen, L. R., Strong, G., Lewin, F., & Chen, S. (2022). The Ineluctable Modality of Securities Law: Why Fungible Crypto Assets Are Not Securities. https://dlxlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2022711/The-Ineluctable-Modality-of-Securities-Law-DLx-LawDiscussion-Draft-Nov.-10-2022.pdf [https://perma.cc/Q76Z-8CDY].
8. Cohen, Lewis R. (2019). Ain't Misbehavin': An Examination of Broadway Tickets and Blockchain Tokens. Wayne L. Rev., 65, 81, 111.
9. Doatan, Y. (2019). Deference and Disagreement in Administrative Law. Admin. L. Rev., 71, 761, 792.
10. Donovan, M. (2023). Ripple effect: the SEC’s major questions doctrine problem. Fordham Law Review, 91, 2309–2352.
11. Engstrom, D. F., & Priddy, J. E. (2022, July 6). West Virginia v. EPA and the Future of the Administrative State. Legal Aggregate. https://law.stanford.edu/2022/07/06/west-virginia-v-epa-and-the-future-of-the-administrative-state/ [https://perma.cc/AE88-7457].
12. Feign, A. (2022, Dec. 11). What Is an ICO?. CoinDesk. https://www.coindesk.com/learn/what-is-an-ico/ [https://perma.cc/ S8T2-AWP4].
13. Gensler, G. (2022, Sept. 8). SEC Speaks: Kennedy and Crypto. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/gensler-sec-speaks-090822 [https://perma.cc/M9BT-J5GS].
14. Giancarlo, Ch., & Bahlke, C. (2020, June 17). Cryptocurrencies and US Securities Laws: Beyond Bitcoin and Ether. IFLR. https://www.iflr.com/article/2a644yk131snh9bzqpou8/cryptocurrencies-and-us-securities-laws-beyond-bitcoin-and-ether [https://perma.cc/97UQ-6CP3].
15. Grewal, P. (2023, Mar. 22). We Asked the SEC for Reasonable Crypto Rules for Americans. We Got Legal Threats Instead. Coinbase. https://www.coinbase.com/blog/we-asked-the-sec-for-reasonable-crypto-rules-for-americans-we-got-legal [https://perma.cc/E59J-CEW5].
16. Heinzerling, L. (2017). The Power Canons. Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 58, 1933, 1970–1974.
17. Hinman, W. (2018, June 14). Digital Asset Transactions: When Howey Met Gary (Plastic). Remarks at the Yahoo Finance All Markets Summit: Crypto. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-hinman-061418 [https://perma.cc/Q9F6-YUNS].
18. Hill, A. C. (2022, July 19). What Does the Supreme Court's Decision in West Virginia v. EPA Mean for U.S. Action on Climate?, Council on Foreign Rels. https://www.cfr.org/blog/what-does-supreme-courts-decision-west-virginia-v-epa-mean-usaction-climate [https://perma.cc/D5A5-55K3].
19. Isaac, Ch. L., Riemer, K. E., Mikhael, Ch., & Humenik, S. M. (2022, May 6). CFTC and SEC Perspectives on Cryptocurrency and Digital Assets—Volume I: A Jurisdictional Overview. K&L Gates, https://www.klgates.com/CFTC-and-SEC-Perspectives-onCryptocurrency-and-Digital-Assets-Volume-I-A-Jurisdictional-0verview-5-6-2022 [https://perma.cc/Z85Q-7SGX].
20. Jakub. (2021, Apr. 1). History of DeFi—from Inception to 2021 and Beyond. Finematics. https://finematics.com/history-ofdefi-explained/ [https: //perma.cc/LMT4-WPLU].
21. Jeans, D., & Emerson, S. (2022, Nov. 12). 'The Devil in Nerd's Clothes': How Sam Bankman-Fried's Cult of Genius Fooled Everyone. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidjeans/2022/11/12/the-devil-in-nerds-clothes-how-sam-bankman-frieds-cultof-genius-fooled-everyone/ [https://perma.cc/3U5E-ZHFM]
22. Johnson, B., Martin, M., & Nixon, B. (2022, July 15). Supreme Court Decision Portends Greater Judicial Scrutiny of FCC. JDSupra. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-decision-portends-greater-8986008/ [https://perma.cc/9UYT-848H].
23. Kiernan, P. (2022, June 14). Crypto Legislation Could Undermine Market Regulations, Gensler Says. Wall St. J. https://www.wsj.com/articles/crypto-legislation-could-undermine-market-regulations-gensler-says-11655231512 [https://perma.cc/8T3R-G9DE].
24. Kuegler, A. (2020). Cryptocurrency and the SEC: How a Piecemeal Approach to Regulating New Technology Selectively Stifles Innovation. Conn. L. Rev., 52, 989. Layton, R. (2021, Aug. 30). The Crypto Uprising the SEC Didn't See Coming. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/roslynlayton/2021/08/30/the-crypto-uprising-the-sec-didnt-see-coming/ [https://perma.cc/RS8W-9YGJ];
25. Leske, K. O. (2016). Major Questions About the "Major Questions" Doctrine. Mich. J. Env't & Admin. L., 5, 479, 489. https://doi.org/10.36640/mjeal.5.2.major
26. Levine, M. (2022, Sept. 8). Gary Gensler Wants to Regulate Crypto. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-09-08/gary-gensler-wants-to-regulate-crypto [https://perma.cc/NB9E-QF5W].
27. Lofchie, S., Almquist, C., & Souchet, S. (2022). The Securities Law Treatment of Utility Tokens (or Why It Is Past Time for the SEC to Engage with the Hard Questions). https://www.friedfrank.com/uploads/siteFiles/Publications/The%20Securities%20Law%20Treatment%20of%20Utility%20Tokens.pdf [https://perma.cc/9EVX-6SLC].
28. Loshin, J., & Nielson, A. (2010). Hiding Nondelegation in Mouseholes. Admin. L. Rev., 62, 19, 62.
29. Moncrieff, A. R. (2008). Reincarnating the "Major Questions" Exception to Chevron Deference as a Doctrine of Non-Interference (or Why Massachusetts v. EPA Got It Wrong). Admin. L. Rev., 60, 593, 594.
30. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [https://perma.cc/T2YTDZR7].
31. Nesler, J. H. (2019, Oct. 28). When It Comes to Analyzing Utility Tokens, the SEC Staff's "Framework for 'Investment Contract' Analysis of Digital Assets" May Be the Emperor Without Clothes (or, Sometimes an Orange Is Just an Orange) (Part I). Winston & Strawn LLP. https://www.winston.com/en/crypto-law-corner/when-it-comes-to-analyzing-utility-tokens-the-sec-staffs-frameworkfor-investment-contract-analysis-of-digital-assets-may-be-the-emperor-without-clothes-or-sometimes-an-orange-is-just-an-orange.html [https://perma.cc/U3SG-Q52G].
32. Nibley, B. (2023, Mar. 1). Bitcoin Price History: 2009–2023. SoFi Learn. https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/bitcoin-pricehistory/ [https://perma.cc/QZD6-SWWQ]
33. Peirce, H. M. (2020, Feb. 6). Running on Empty: A Proposal to Fill the Gap Between Regulation and Decentralization. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/peirce-remarks-blockress-2020-02-06 [https://perma.cc/L85B-BWNC].
34. Peirce, H. M. (Sept. 24, 2018). Wolves and Wolverines: Remarks at the University of Michigan Law School. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-peirce-092418 [https://perma.cc/L55J-3FML].
35. Pham, C. (2022, July 21). Statement of Commissioner Caroline D. Pham on SEC v. Wahi. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/phamstatement072122 [https://perma.cc/Z64Q-AYLF].
36. Phillips, T. (2021). The SEC's Regulatory Role in the Digital Asset Markets. https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/ uploads/2021/10/SECs-Regulatory-Role-in-the-Digital-Asset-Markets-1.pdf [https://perma.cc/CZ93-FM3U].
37. Renteria, N., Wilson, T., & Strohecker, K. (2021, June 9). In A World First, El Salvador Makes Bitcoin Legal Tender. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/el-salvador-approves-first-law-bitcoin-legal-tender-2021-06-09/ [https://perma.cc/M7EUXXPH?type=image].
38. Richardson, N. (2022). Antideference: COVID, Climate, and the Rise of the Major Questions Canon. Va. L. Rev. Online, 108, 174, 180.
39. Richardson, N. (2016). Keeping Big Cases from Making Bad Law: The Resurgent “Major Questions” Doctrine. Conn. L. Rev., 49, 355, 382–385.
40. Roberts, D. (2019, Oct. 10). CFTC Says Cryptocurrency Ether Is a Commodity, and Ether Futures Are Next. Yahoo! Fin. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cftc-says-cryptocurrency-ether-is-a-commodity-and-is-open-to-ether-derivatives-133455545.html [https://perma.cc/V3QH-8DST].
41. Rooney, K. (2018, June 6). SEC Chief Says Agency Won't Change Securities Laws to Cater to Cryptocurrencies. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/06/sec-chairman-clayton-says-agency-wont-change-definition-of-a-security.html [https://perma.cc/8UC6-6ZEF].
42. Rosner, Marcel T., & Kang. (2016). Understanding and Regulating Twenty-First Century Payment Systems: The Ripple Case Study. Mich. L. Rev., 114, 649, 657–660.
43. Schwartz, L. (2022, Nov. 30). 'Inaction Is Paralysis': CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam Calls for Regulation in the Wake of FTX's Collapse. Fortune Crypto. https://fortune.com/crypto/2022/11/30/inaction-is-paralysis-cftc-chair-rostin-behnam-calls-for-regulationin-the-wake-of-ftxs-collapse/ [https://perma.cc/D83A-QAA3]
44. Shalal, A. (2021, July 8). Sen. Warren Warns of Cryptocurrency Risks, Presses SEC on Oversight Authority. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/sen-warren-warns-cryptocurrency-risks-presses-sec-oversight-authority-2021-07-08/ [https://perma.cc/W5EG-896K].
45. Shapiro, G. (2021, May 10). How SEC vs. Ripple Stems from an Age-Old Philosophical Debate. Lex_Node's Off. CryptoLaw Newsl. https://lexnode.substack.com/p/how-sec-vs-ripple-stems-from-an-age [https://perma.cc/S93W-JGD4].
46. Shapiro, G. (2020, Apr. 15). Defining Decentralization for the Law. Medium. https://lex-node.medium.com/definingdecentralization-for-law-58ca54e18b2a [https://perma.cc/8T7J-QKPY].
47. Srivastava, N. (2020, Nov. 19). Drivers and Barriers for Adoption of Blockchain. Blockchain Council. https://www.blockchaincouncil.org/blockchain/drivers-and-barriers-for-adoption-of-blockchain/ [https://perma.cc/L6FK-8Q6F].
48. Sunstein, C. R. (2021). There Are Two “Major Questions” Doctrines. Admin. L. Rev., 73, 475, 483.
49. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Chevron Step Zero. Va. L. Rev., 92, 187.
50. Stump, D. D. (2021). Digital Assets: Clarifying CFTC Regulatory Authority & the Fallacy of the Question, "Is It a Commodity or a Security?". https://www.cftc.gov/media/6306/DigitalAssetsAuthorityInfographic_CommStump082321/download [https://perma.cc/7WSD-BUDU].
51. Temkin, B. R., King, C. L., & Markarian, M. (2020). SEC Regulation Best Interest: A Practical Guide for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3566610 [https://perma.cc/62ZT-J9RL].
52. Tinianow, A. (2022, July 1). The Supreme Court's Wrecking Ball Could Impact SEC Authority. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/andreatinianow/2022/07/01/the-supreme-courts-wrecking-ball-could-impact-sec-authority [https://perma.cc/45DV-KR7V].
53. U.S. Dept. of Just. (2015 May 5). Ripple Labs Inc. Resolves Criminal Investigation: Press Release. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ripple-labs-inc-resolves-criminal-investigation [https://perma.cc/UQD7-LRDY].
54. Van Valkenburgh, P. (2018, Aug.). Framework for Securities Regulation of Cryptocurrencies 2.0. Coin Ctr. https://www. coincenter.org/framework-for-securities-regulation-of-cryptocurrencies/ [https://perma.cc/2KT6-D6YM].
55. Warmbrodt, Z. (2022, Mar. 15). Elizabeth Warren's Anti-Crypto Crusade Splits the Left. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/15/democrats-divided-crypto-future-00015804 [https://perma.cc/2884-GUMX].
Review
For citations:
Donovan M. Ripple effect: the SEC’s major questions doctrine problem. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2023;17(4):837-872. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.837-872. EDN: AWINLM