Features of industrial policy implementation in the modern Russian economy

Objective: in the modern economic system under globalization, effective industrial policy is one of the basic conditions for ensuring sustainable economic development in the context of multipolar economic systems formation and development. The tools of industrial policy implementation form the conditions for the advanced development of both national and regional economies. The study objective is to identify the key features of industrial development of the national economic system under globalization, as well as the basic tools for the effective industrial policy implementation in the Russian economy.

Methods: when considering the features and factors of industrial development and the tools for the effective industrial policy implementation, we used such methods as system and historical analysis, comparison and identification of the key features of industrial policy implementation and transformation tools in the modern Russian economy.

Results: based on the analysis of the world experience of industrial policy implementation along the main models of industrial development, the advantages and disadvantages of each respective model of industrial policy were determined; within the framework of the innovative model of industrial development, the indicators for assessing the effectiveness of industrial policy were systematized, as well as the peculiarities of the formation of the innovative environment of industrial development; the peculiarities of industrial policy implementation in the Russian economic system under globalization were revealed, the basic tools for the effective industrial policy implementation were structured.

Scientific novelty: based on the analysis of industrial development processes and scientific approaches to industrial development and implementation of industrial policy, the peculiarities of using the industrial policy tools in the Russian economic system were revealed in the framework of combination and transformation of tools of innovative and importsubstituting models of industrial policy implementation; the contradiction was identified in the changing role of the state in the implementation of effective industrial policy in the modern economy under globalization (in recent decades, the trend of the weakening role of the state in developed economies is replaced by the need to strengthen the state to ensure effective innovation process and industrial development); the tools for the industrial policy implementation in the modern economic system were systematized based on the analysis of world experience.

Practical significance: the results of the study of industrial policy tools in the modern economy, taking into account the regional aspect, can be used to establish mechanisms for the innovation process implementation and import substitution in the modern Russian economy based on the adjustment of the tools used and the industrial policy implementation methods, in order to form and implement the programs of sustainable industrial development at the federal and regional levels. 

1. Abdikeev, N. M., Bogachev, Yu. S., Trifonov, P. V., & Dontsova, O. I. (2020). Priority directions of aviation industry development. Polet, 9, 24–31. (In Russ.).

2. Balashov, M. M. (2020). Import substitution in the power engineering industry. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 11(2), 182–195. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2020-2-182-195

3. Bendikov, M. A., & Ganichev,. N. A. (2015). Dependence on electronic components import and ways to overcome it (the space industry case). Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 3, 2–17. (In Russ.).

4. Borisov, V. N., & Pochukaeva, O. V. (2021). Developing import substitution as a result of the growth of the competitiveness of investment equipment. Territory Development, 2, 10–18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2021-2-10-18

5. Bukhvalov, A. V., & Katkalo, V. (2008). Modern interpretations of diversification strategies. Russian Management Journal, 6(1), 57–64. (In Russ.).

6. Bukhvalov, A. V., & Katkalo, V. (2004). New trends in conceptualization of strategic management of innovations. Russian Management Journal, 2(4), 59–66. (In Russ.).

7. Chen, J. L., Xiao, Y. C., & Zhou, J. L. (2015). Comprehensive Evaluation and Prediction Model of Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the 2015 Joint International Mechanical, Electronic and Information Technology Conference (pp. 565–569). https://doi.org/10.2991/jimet-15.2015.107

8. Grabchak, E., Medvedeva, E., & Golovanov, K. (2016). Import replacement – driver for evolution or forced measure. Energy Policy, 3, 74–85.

9. Karmanov, Yu. (2008). Industrial policy and foreign economic links. Economist, 6, 31–35. (In Russ.).

10. Katkalo, V. S. (2006). Evolution of the theory of strategic management. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of St. Petersburg State University.

11. Kralj, D., & Markic, M. (2007). Sustainable development and processes innovation. Environmental Science, Ecosystems and Development.

12. Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Alves, F., Pace, P., Mifsud, M., Brandli, L., … Disterheft, A. (2018). Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: the role of the sustainable development goals (SDG). International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1342103

13. Lorek, E., & Lorek, P. (2017). Modern software tools in sustainable development programming. Ekonomia i srodowisko – economics and environment, 60, 72–80.

14. Malaev, V. V., & Nizamutdinov, I. K. (2014). Inequality and economic development of the society. Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan, 1, 38–42. (In Russ.).

15. Miller, A., & Miller, M. (2019). Study of the problems of technological integration in the manufacturing industry in Russia. Strategic Management, 24(3), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.5937/straman1903033m

16. Nizamutdinov, I. K. (2012). Industrial policy implementation in the Republic of Tatarstan. In Modern issues of the world economy globalization and human social-cultural development: works of the concluding scientific-practical conference (Vol. II, pp. 228–230). Kazan: Publishing house of the Institute of Management, Economics and Finance of Kazan Federal University.

17. Nizamutdinov, I. (2023). Industrial Policy and Innovation Process in the Modern Russian Economy. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences, 8(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2023-8-4-498-506

18. Penrose, Е. (1959). The theory of growth of the firm. New York.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. B. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management. Englewood Cliffs.

20. Rumelt, R.P. (1974). Strategy, structure and economic performance. Boston.

21. Safiullin, A. R., Safiullina, K. G., & Gataullina, L. R. (2005). Industrial profile as the basis for competitive advantages of a territory. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 10-2(36), 41–48. (In Russ.).

22. Selishchev, T. A. (2018). “Green” economy as a model for sustainable development of EAEU states. Problems of Modern Economics, 3(67), 6–12. (In Russ.).

23. Sorokina, A. I., Mozharova, E. I., & Bordova, A. A. (2022). Import substitution in modern conditions. Collection of scientific works of Angarsk State Technical University, 19, 360–367. (In Russ.).

24. Swain, R., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2020). Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2, 96–106.

25. Teece, D. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 223–245.

26. Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multi-product firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 39–63.

27. Teece, D. J. (2001). Managing intellectual capital. New York.

28. Tolstel, M. S., Kosinova, N. N., & Chigareva, T. V. (2017). Development of Methodological Approach to Analysis of Sustainable Development of Industrial Enterprises Under the Conditions of Clustering. In E. Popkova (Ed.), Russia and the European Union: development and perspectives (рp. 299–305). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55257-6_39

29. Trifonov, P. V. (2021). Analysis of the competitiveness of products of high-tech sector of the manufacturing industry of the Russian Federation in domestic and foreign markets. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 230(4), 196–203. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2021-230-4-196-203

30. Vatolkina, N. Sh., & Gorbunova, N. V. (2015). Import substitution: international experience, instruments. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 6, 29–39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.5862/je.233.3

31. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207

32. Wernerfelt, В. (1995). A resource-based view of the firm: ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160303

33. Xin, L. (2013). The Researches on Operational Mechanism of Circular Ecoomy. In International Conference on Management (pр. 725–730).