China’s Digital Silk Road initiative: directions and prospects of development, advantages and risks for Russia
https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2025.1.57-79
Abstract
Objective: to analyze China’s Digital Silk Road Initiative (DSR) as one of the key elements of the PRC’s strategy within the “One Belt, One Road” project; to identify and systematize the main directions of the DSR program and its impact on global digital transformation; to analyze the prospects for cooperation between Russia and China in relation to the economic and geopolitical goals of the Russian Federation.
Methods: general scientific methods of cognition were used, such as analysis, synthesis, inductive-deductive and structural-functional methods, systematic and comparative analyses.
Results: the main directions, tools and technologies of the Digital Silk Road Initiative were identified. The main political (geopolitical) approaches to DSR were identified and analyzed. The research assesses the geopolitical landscape of the Initiative implementation, taking into account the position of its technological competitors and partner countries. The author assesses the risks of debt dependence of countries and develops the DSR scenarios. The work reveals the DSR impact on the economic and geopolitical positioning of Russia in the global digital space.
Scientific novelty: the author proposes to consider DSR as one of the key directions for the digital multipolar world development, as a multidimensional project uniting the economic, technological and geopolitical goals of China. In addition, the paper uses the latest data on China’s investment activity in the Asia-Pacific region, Africa and South America, applies and comprehends modern economic and geopolitical theories for DSR analysis. Project development scenarios are proposed in the context of global technological competition.
Practical significance: the analysis of the main DSR directions and geography allows a systematic approach to building economic and geopolitical forecasts regarding the development of certain digital technologies and projects. It may help to develop recommendations on optimizing the cooperation strategy with China within the DSR and on creating mechanisms and tools for regulating digital initiatives (cybersecurity standards, digital arbitrations, etc.). It provides important information for evaluating the possibilities of cooperation between Russian and Chinese corporations within the DSR project.
About the Author
E. L. SidorenkoRussian Federation
Elina L. Sidorenko, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Council under the President of the Russian Federation for the development of civil society and human rights
Web of Science Researcher ID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/P-9046-2015
Elina L. Sidorenko, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Council under the President of the Russian Federation for the development of civil society and human rights
E-mail: 12011979@list.ru
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4741-0184
Web of Science Researcher ID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/P-9046-2015
References
1. Buzan, B. (2004). From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616617
2. Cheng, Guo. (2022). China’s Digital Silk Road in the age of the digital economy: Political analysis. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-271-287
3. Ciuriak, D. (2021, November 9). Unfree Flow with No Trust: The Implications of Geoeconomics and Geopolitics for Data and Digital Trade. Project for Peaceful Competition, The Policy Institute, King’s College London, 6 December 2021; and Centre for International Governance Innovation, 14 February 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3963074
4. Creemers, R. (2021, January 31). China’s Long and Winding Road in Global Cyberspace: Great Power Relationships or Common Destiny? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3776814
5. Danilin, I. V. (2020). The U.S.-China Technology War: Risks and Opportunities for P.R.C. and Global Tech Sector. Comparative Politics Russia, 11(4), 160–176. (In Russ.).
6. Degterev, D. A., Piskunov, D. A., & Eremin, A. A. (2023). U.S. – China rivalry in Latin America: at the origins of technological decoupling. Polis. Political Studies, 3. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.03.03
7. Deych, T. L. (2018). China in Africa: Neo-Colonial Power or “Win-Win” Strategy? Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 11(5), 119–141. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-5-119-141
8. Duarte, L. Albro, R., & Hershberg, E. (2022, February 1). Communicating Influence: China’s Messaging in Latin America and the Caribbean. CLALS Working Paper Series, 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4061082
9. Erie, M. S., & Streinz, Th. (2021). The Beijing Effect: China's 'Digital Silk Road' as Transnational Data Governance. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (JILP), 54, 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3810256
10. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. (2019). Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
11. Fyodorov, A. V., & Zinovyeva, E. S. (2017). Information security: political theory and diplomatic practice. Мoscow: Moscow State Institute of International Relations. (In Russ.).
12. Ghiasy, R., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2020). China's Digital Silk Road – Strategic Implications. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) and the Leiden Asia Centre (LAC).
13. Gong, S. & Li, B. (2019). The Digital Silk Road and the Sustainable Development Goals. IDS Bulletin, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2019.137
14. Huadong Guo, Jie Liu, Yubao Qiu, Massimo Menenti, Fang Chen, Paul F. Uhlir, Li Zhang, John van Genderen, Dong Liang, Ishwaran Natarajan, Lanwei Zhu, & Jiuliang Liu. (2018). The Digital Belt and Road program in support of regional sustainability. International Journal of Digital Earth, 11(7), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2018.1471790
15. Jing Cheng, Zeng Jinghan. (2024). “Digital silk road” as a slogan instead of a grand strategy. Journal of Contemporary China, 33(149), 823–838.
16. Chomsky, N. (2002). Profit over People: Neoliberalism and Global Order. Moscow: Praksis. (In Russ.).
17. Krause, K. (1995). Arms and the state: patterns of military production and trade (No. 22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Krivokhizh, S., & Soboleva, E. (2023). Strategic Narratives in China’s Bid for Discursive Hegemony. International Organisations Research Journal, 18(2), 178–192. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2023-02-09
19. Kulikova, N. N. (2016). The model of inter-organizational interactions in the electronic industry. Problems of Modern Economics, 2, 98–101. (In Russ.).
20. Lin, Zhiyang. (2022). Cooperation between China and Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN): Prospects and Dilemmas. Terra Incognita, 19, 139–158. (In Russ.).
21. Mikhaylichenko, Ch. M. (2018). Africa’s Role in Chinese People's Republic Initiative “One Belt and One Road”. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 60–68. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2018-20-1-60-68
22. Nye, J. S. (2010). The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
23. Peng, Shin-yi. (2021, October 1). The Uneasy Interplay between Digital Inequality and International Economic Law. European Journal of International Law, 33(1), 205–235 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chac019
24. Pozdnyakov, E. (2020). “Blue Dot Network” As An Instrument Of Competition Between Australia And The Prc In The South-Pacific Ocean Region. Norwegian Journal of development of the International Science, 39, 50–53. (In Russ.).
25. Rahman, K. S., & Thelen, K. (2019). The rise of the platform business model and the transformation of twenty-first-century capitalism. Politics & Society, 47(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219838932
26. Rosecrance, R. (1986). The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.
27. Sahakyan, Mh., & Gärtner, H. (2022). China and Eurasia: Rethinking Cooperation and Contradictions in the Era of Changing World Order. Routledge. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4339053
28. Sidorenko, E. L. (2024). Merging the interests of governments and Western monopolies in the field of ICT: modern geopolitical models. Polis. Political Studies, 6. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.06.03
29. Slaughter, A.-M. (2009). A New World Order. Princeton University Press.
30. Srnicek, N. (2019). Platform Capitalism. Moscow: VSE Publisher House. (In Russ.).
31. Streinz, T. (2021). Designing International Economic Data Law. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 115(2021), 73–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4079058
32. Suozhu, H. (2022). Relations between China and South Korea: the role of the American factor. Pacific RIM: Economics, Politics, Law, 24(2), 73–84. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24866/1813-3274/2022-2/73-84
33. Taylor, R. D. (2021, August 1). Telecom’s Road to 2030: ‘What If We Were to Do Nothing?’ TPRC49: The 49th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897409
34. Temirbulatov, A. (2013). Transnational corporations and US geopolitical strategies in the Caspian Sea region. The Authority, 12, 81–83. (In Russ.).
35. Tomin, L. (2020). The Relationship of the State and Corporations in the Age of “Platform Capitalism”. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 15(4), 483–496. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2019.403
36. Vernengo, M., & Caldentey, E. (2016). Raúl Prebisch and economic dynamics: Cyclical growth and centre-periphery interaction. CEPAL Review, 2016(118), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.18356/521ccb95-en
37. Vinogradov, A. O., Salitsky, A. I., & Semenova, N. K. (2019). US-China Economic Confrontation: Ideology, Chronology, Meaning. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19(1), 35–46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-35-46
38. Vykhodets, R. S. (2022). China’s AI Strategy. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 16(2), 140–147. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2022-02-140-147
39. Yang, X. A., Yan, Xuetong. (2020). Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 25, 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09644-9
40. Zaitsev, S. (2022). Areas of interaction between digital corporations and the government in the political sphere of Russia. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 18(1), 56–71. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2022.104
41. Zaytsev, S. Y. (2023). Political Power of Digital Transnational Corporations: To the Problem of Research. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 10(1), 116–129. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2023-10-1-116-129
42. Zhang, F. The Rise of Chinese Exceptionalism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111421038
43. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
Review
For citations:
Sidorenko E.L. China’s Digital Silk Road initiative: directions and prospects of development, advantages and risks for Russia. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2025;19(1):57-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2025.1.57-79