Preview

Russian Journal of Economics and Law

Advanced search

Estimating well-being of small and medium enterprises in modern Russia: macroeconomic aspect

https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2025.4.947-966

Abstract

Objective: to conduct a comprehensive macroeconomic assessment of the state of the Russian small and medium enterprises (SMEs) sector through the prism of a multicomponent model of well-being.
Methods: general scientific methods of structural and comparative analysis, as well as specific scientific methods (static analysis for processing data from Rosstat, the Russian Federal Tax Service, the Public Opinion Foundation; expert assessments for interpreting surveys; graphical analysis for visualizing dynamic series; modeling for developing a conceptual model of the SMEs well-being).
Results: the research substantiated the need to apply a comprehensive approach to the analysis of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) as part of the concept of economic agents’ well-being. The author performed a theoretical analysis of the well-being phenomenon and formulated a definition of the small and medium businesses’ well-being. Based on the adaptation of C. Ryff’s six-factor model, the author developed and tested a seven-component model of the SME sector well-being at the macro level. The model components analysis revealed a contradiction: while national projects formally achieve some of the targets (number of employees, share in non-resource exports), the key indicator (SMEs’ share in GDP) remains stagnant at 20-22%. At the same time, there is pessimism in business sentiment, high tax and administrative pressure, a shortage of qualified personnel, a reduction in government support and a low level of trust in institutions.
Scientific novelty: it consists in the development of an original macroeconomic model of the SME sector well-being, expanded with the “Involvement in digitalization processes” component, which adequately reflects the modern economy challenges and allows overcoming the fragmented research in this sector.
Practical significance: the obtained results and the proposed model can be used by government authorities to adjust economic policies and support programs for SMEs, focusing them on solving systemic problems identified during the component analysis. The article materials are also applicable in scientific and educational activities for the interdisciplinary study of the phenomenon of economic agents’ well-being.

About the Author

E. A. Koroleva
Central Economic Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Россия

Ekaterina A. Koroleva, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Microeconomic Analysis and Modeling

Scopus Author ID: 57205202433

Moscow



References

1. Alekhnovich, A. O., & Anuchin, L. L. (2021). Evaluation and Adjustment of the Law Enforcement Practice of State Control and Supervision Bodies: Administrative Pressure Index. Public Administration Issues, 1, 7–29. (In Russ.).

2. Andrews, F. M., & Whitey, S. S. (1976). Social Indicators of Well-Being. Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality. New York: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2253-5

3. Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D. et al. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: А meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226

4. Arrow, K. J. (1972). Gifts and Exchanges. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(4), 343–362.

5. Bradburn, N. (1969). The Structure of Psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.

6. Chemodanova, A. A. (2023). Fact checking as a technique during an information war. In New trends of journalism and media communications – 2023: collection of scientific articles of the 2nd International scientific-practical conference, Moscow, April 14, 2023 (pp. 44–48). Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. (In Russ.).

7. Dementyev, V. E. (2004). Trust as a factor of functioning and development of modern market economy. Russian Economic Journal, 8, 46–65. (In Russ.).

8. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

9. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

10. Dominko, M., & Verbič, M. (2022). The effect of subjective well-being on consumption behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(2), 876–898.

11. Drucker, P. (1939). The End of Economic Man: A Study of the New Totalitarianism. New York: John Day Co.

12. Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.

13. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-B

14. Efremova, S. (2024). Survey: Business is Acutely Short of Engineers and Technologists. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 249(9491). (In Russ.). https://rg.ru/2024/10/28/opros-biznesu-ostro-ne-hvataet-inzhenerov-i-tehnologov.html

15. Egorova, N. E., & Khromov, I. E. (2005). Models and methods of the cgoice of the scheme of the taxation at the substantiation of the development strategy of the small enterprise. Audit and Financial Analysis, 3, 25–80. (In Russ.).

16. European Commission (2007). Report of the Expert Group: Models to Reduce the Dispropor tionate Regulatory Burden on SMEs. European Commission, Enterprise and Industry Directo rate General. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/2265/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native

17. Frey, B. S., Stutzer, А. (2002). What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.

18. Fukuyama, F. (2004). Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Moscow: AST: ZAO “Ermak”. (In Russ.).

19. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well–being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446.

20. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16489–16493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011492107

21. Kazun, A. P. (2025). With a team and without debt: Factors affecting small business survival in Russia in 2021–2023. Voprosy Economiki, 5, 83–110. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-5-83-110

22. Kleiner, G. B. (1999). Russia's Economy and the Crisis of Mutual Expectations. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 12, 5–19. (In Russ.).

23. Kleiner, G. B. (Ed.) (2023). System-oriented modeling of the real sector of Russian meso-economy: monograph. Moscow: “Nauchsanya biblioteka” Publishing House. (In Russ.).

24. Koroleva, E. A. (2024). On the Relationship between Trust and Digital Well-Being in the Modern Economy. Economy and Entrepreneurship, 11, 1354–1359. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2024.172.11.243

25. Leontiev, D. A. (2020). Happiness and Well-Being: Toward the Construction of the Conceptual Field. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1(155), 14–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.02

26. Lola, I. S., Asoskov, D. G., & Usov, N. A. (2025). Complex indicators of business activity: current and prognostic trajectories. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics. (In Russ.).

27. Luhmann, M., Hofman, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective Well-Being and Adaptation to Life Events: A MetaAnalysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615.

28. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006824100041

29. Marsden, D. (1986). The End of Economic Man? Custom and Competition in Labour Markets. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

30. Martin, J., Hùng, T. H., Baccarani, C., & Testa, F. (2023). The Wellbeing Enterprise for Sustainability: Theory, Tenets, Testing. In M. V. Ciasullo, J. Martin, & F. Brunetti (Eds.), Embracing Sustainability Management Through Excellence in Services. EISIC 2023. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65115-1_1

31. Milner, B. Z. (1997). Trust factor during economic reforms. Voprosy Economiki, 11, 27–38. (In Russ.).

32. Misikhina, S. (2025). Comments on state and business No. 529. Institutional environment. Support for SME entities and self-employed in the first quarter of 2025. HSE Centre of Development Institute. (In Russ.). https://dcenter.hse.ru/data/2025/06/25/1990279644/KGB_529_институты_МСП_Chart.pdf

33. NAFI (2024, May 14). Research by NAFI, “Delovaya Rossiya” and the Russian Civic Chamber “Does the society trust business in Russia?”. NAFI Analytical Center. (In Russ.). https://nafi.ru/analytics/doveryaet-li-obshchestvo-rossiyskomu-biznesuissledovanie-nafi-delovoy-rossii-i-op-rf/

34. NAFI. (2022, October 14). 82% of the Russian encountered fraud attempts. NAFI Analytical Center. (In Russ.). https://nafi.ru/analytics/82-rossiyan-stalkivalis-s-popytkami-moshennichestva/

35. NAFI. (2024, May 20). Every third representative of SME uses artificial intelligence at work. NAFI Analytical Center. https://nafi.ru/analytics/kazhdyy-tretiy-predstavitel-msp-ispolzuet-iskusstvennyy-intellekt-v-rabote/

36. NAFI. (2025, March 28). Investments into personnel and financial safety net – the main anti-crisis measures of the Russian business. NAFI Analytical Center. (In Russ.). https://nafi.ru/analytics/itogi-2024-goda-chto-predprinimateli-znayut-o-natsionalnykhproektakh/

37. Nurmukhametov, R. K., & Torin, S. S. (2020). Digital Trust: The Essence and Measures to Increase It. Izvestiya Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences, 1, 32–38. (In Russ.).

38. OECD. (2019). Strengthening SMEs and Entrepreneurship for Productivity and Inclusive Growth: OECD 2018. Ministerial Conference on SMEs, OECD Studies on SMEs and Entre preneurship. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c19b6f97-en

39. Osin, E. N., & Leontiev, D. A. (2020). Brief Russian-Language Instruments to Measure Subjective Well-Being: Psychometric Properties and Comparative Analysis. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1(155), 117–142. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06

40. Oslon, A. A. (2024). Sociology of small business. Small business: life goes on. Traumas, transformations and acquisitions after February 2022. Moscow: Institute of the Public Opinion Foundation. (In Russ.).

41. Ovchinnikov, A. I. (2018). Development trends of law in the conditions of a new technological structure. Philosophy of Law, 3(86), 26–32. (In Russ.).

42. Persky, J. (1995). Retrospectives: The Ethology of Homo Economicus. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 221–231.

43. Ponikarovskaya, A., & Tsymbal, M. (2025). Tenth wave of PRIM: situation with the self-employed in the first quarter of 2025. Research and Communications FOM-Project SMBiz. (In Russ.). https://smbiz.fom.ru/post/desyataya-volna-prima-situaciya-usamozanyatyh-v-i-kvartale-2025-goda

44. Rodionova, N. V., & Gusev, N. O. (2024). The role of science in the battle between “homo economicus” and “homo ethicus” for community values in management systems. Bulletin of Vladimir State University named after Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Grigorievich Stoletov. Series: Economic Sciences, 3(41), 179–191. (In Russ.).

45. Rosstat. (2024). Small and medium business in Russia. Moscow. (in Russ.).

46. Rubtsova, N. E., & Lenkov, S. L. (2020). The impact of digital socialization on psychological well-being. Psychology in Education, 2(2), 143–149. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2020-2-2-143-149

47. Rybakovsky, O. L., & Fadeeva, T. A. (2022). Structural Demographic Waves of Russian Regions: Preliminary Analysis. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 18(4), 425–438. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.4.1

48. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.

49. Seligman, M. (2013). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. (In Russ.).

50. Skachkova, L. S., Gerasimova, O. Ya., Krivosheeva-Medyantseva, D. D., & Yakovleva, E. A. (2023). Happiness economics: a scoping review. Journal of Institutional Studies, 15(3), 125–146. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.3.125-146

51. Stiglitz, J. Y. (2005). The Roaring Nineties: A New History of the World's Most Prosperous Decade. Moscow: Modern Economy and Law. (In Russ.).

52. Veselov, Y. V., & Skvortsov, N. G. (2023). Transformation of the Culture of Trust in Russia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1(173), 157–179. https:// doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2023.1.2212 (In Russ.).

53. Wilson, W. R. (1967) Correlates of Avowed Happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67(4), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024431

54. Zhiromskaya, V. B. (2010). Problems of the demographic development of Russia in the 20th century. Trudy Instituta Rossiyskoy Istorii RAN, 9, 285–310. (In Russ.).

55. Zhukovskaya, L. V., & Troshikhina, E. G. (2011). K. Riff's Scale of Psychological Well-Being. Psikhologicheskij zhurnal, 32(2), 82–93. (In Russ.).

56. Institute for Complex Strategic Research (ICSR). (2024). Small and medium business under the new conditions: problems and measures necessary for development. https://icss.ru/images/macro/20240205_ИКСИ%20МСП%20(6).pdf


Review

For citations:


Koroleva E.A. Estimating well-being of small and medium enterprises in modern Russia: macroeconomic aspect. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2025;19(4):947-966. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2025.4.947-966

Views: 596

JATS XML

ISSN 2782-2923 (Print)