Institutional bases of public-private partnership development

Objective: to identify and systematize the institutional foundations for the development of public-private partnership (PPP)at the national level.Methods: when writing the article, historical, logical, country-study and comparative methods were used. The main data sources used were information materials on public-private partnership issues developed by the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, the European Commission, and the World Bank Group, as well as the databases of PPP projects: Rosinfra (www.rosinfra.ru/project) and EPEC Data Portal (www.data.eib.org/epec).Results: the study found that the basis of the institutional environment of public-private partnership is formed by the following elements: legal regulation of PPP, development institutions, and state policy in this area. Within the framework of legal regulation, two main approaches were identified: (1) the existence of special legislation on public-private partnership and (2) the regulation of public-private partnership on the basis of common law. A classification of national PPP development institutions was been elaborated. The author’s vision of the stages of the state policy evolutionary development in this area is proposed. The analysis carried out and the classifications obtained are confirmed by the cases of such countries as Russia, France, and Germany. Scientific novelty: the article systematizes the main elements that make up the institutional basis for the PPP development. Their interrelation is established, as well as the nature of each element influence on the level of public-private partnership market development in the country. In particular, the existence of the legal field of PPP, as well as the appropriate development institution, creates the basic conditions for starting projects in this area. At the same time, the content of the state policy in the field of PPP as the third institutional element determines the qualitative characteristics of this market development. The state policy of regulating the public-private partnership has four main stages of development: “formation”; “total application”; “PPP as a tool for the territory development”; “PPP as a means of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”. Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the work can be used by executive authorities both at the federal and regional levels in order to further improve the institutional framework for the PPP development, which, in turn, will contribute to a more effective implementation of PPP projects and can provide the necessary inflow of investments into infrastructure sectors.

Economics and national economy management, Public-private partnership (PPP), Public policy, Infrastructure, Project

1. How effective is public infrastructure investment in supporting COVID-19 economic recovery efforts? Global Infrastructure Hub. URL: https://www.gihub.org/infrastructure-monitor/insights/fiscal-multiplier-effect-of-infrastructure-investment/(дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

2. Boardman A., Vining A. Assessing the economic worth of public-private partnerships. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 2010. 28 p.

3. Savas E. Privatization and Public Private Partnerships. N. Y.: Chatham House Publishers, 2000. 79 p.

4. Grimsey D., Lewis M. K. Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: EdwardElgar, 2004. 25 p.

5. Delmon J. Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure: Project Finance, PPP Projects and Risk. The World Bank and Kluwer Law International, 2010. 7 p.

6. Варнавский В. Г. Государственно-частное партнерство. М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2009. 14 с.

7. Bibliometric Analysis of PPP and PFI Literature: Overview of 25 Years of Research / D. de C. e S. Neto, C. O. Cruz, F. Rodrigues, P. Silva // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2016. P. 7. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001163

8. Bennett J., Iossa E. Building and managing facilities for public services // J. Public Econ. 2006. № 90 (10). Pp. 2143-2160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.04.001

9. Meda F. A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships // Int. J. Project Manage. 2007. № 25 (3). Pp. 213-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.003

10. Cruz C. O., Marques R. C. Exogenous determinants for renegotiating public infrastructure concessions: Evidence from Portugal // J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 2013. Vol. 139, Iss. 9. Pp. 1082-1090. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000710

11. Whitfield D. PPP Wealth Machine: UK and Global trends in trading project ownership, European Services Strategy Unit, 2012. № 6. P. 48. URL: http://www.european-services-strategy.org.uk/ppp-database/ppp-equity-database/ppp-wealth-machine- parts-1-8.pdf (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

12. World Bank Group Support to Public-Private Partnerships: Lessons from Experience in Client Countries. FY02-12. Independent Evaluation Group (IEG), 2014. 121 p. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/405891468334813110/pdf/93629-REVISED-Box394822B-PUBLIC.pdf (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

13. Hall D. Why Public-Private Partnerships don’t work: The many advantages of the public alternative, London, PSIRU, 2015, 37 p., available at: http://www.world-psi.org/sites/default/files/rapport_eng_56pages_a4_lr.pdf (access date: 29.03.2021).

14. Benchmarking PPP Procurement: Assessing Government Capability to prepare, Procure and Manage PPPs. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. 2016. 23 p.

15. Procuring Infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships Report 2018. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. Pp. 27.

16. PPP Policy, Legal and Institutional Frameworks in Asia and the Pacific / Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. 2015. 3 p.

17. Establishing the PPP Framework. PPP KNOWLEDGE LAB. URL: https://pppknowledgelab.org/guide/sections/5-establishing-the-ppp-framework (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

18. Farquharson et al. How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging Markets. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. 2011. URL: https://ppiaf.org/documents/16 (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

19. Yong H. K. Public-Private Partnerships Policy and Practice: a Reference Guide. 2010. 139 p. URL: https://read.oecd-ilibrary. org/commonwealth/governance/public-private-partnerships-policy-and-practice_9781848590694-en#page139 (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

20. Ashley B. et al. Handbook for Evaluating Infrastructure Regulatory Systems. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006. 78 p.

21. Eberhard A. Matching Regulatory Design to Country Circumstances: The Potential of Hybrid and Transitional Models. Gridlines Note 23, PPIAF, Washington, DC. May, 2007. 139 p.

22. Apurva S. et al. Designing and Using Public-Private Partnership Units in Infrastructure: Lessons from Case Studies around the World. Gridlines Note 27, PPIAF. Washington, DC, 2007. 89 p.

23. Bonhage J., Mueller H. The Public-Private Partnership Law Review: Germany. URL: https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-public-private-partnership-law-review/germany (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

24. Инвестиции в инфраструктуру и ГЧП 2020. Аналитический обзор. АНО «Национальный центр ГЧП», 2020. С. 5.

25. Vaissier F.-G. et al. The Public-Private Partnership Law Review: France. URL: https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-public- private-partnership-law-review/france (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

26. О развитии государственно-частного партнерства в Российской Федерации: информационно-аналитический обзор. Министерство экономического развития Российской Федерации, 2020. С. 4-5.

27. Review of the European PPP Market for 2019. The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC). URL: https://www.eib.org/en/publications/epec-market-update-2019 (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

28. О Национальном центре ГЧП. URL: https://pppcenter.ru/o-tsentre/(дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

29. Saussier S., Phuong Tra Tran P. T. The Efficiency of Public-Private Partnerships in France: An Initial Quantitative Evaluation // Revue d'économie industrielle. 2012. № 81. 22 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.5480

30. Müller B. The Development of a National PPP Unit: the German Experience. Regional Conference on Concessions and Public-Private Partnerships. Zagreb, 3-4 December 2009. URL: http://www.sigmaweb.org/publicationsdocuments/44406329.pdf (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

31. Schäfer M., Rethmann L. Öffentlich-Private Daseinsvorsorge (ÖPD) und Öffentlich-Private Partnerschaften (ÖPP): Gemeinsamkeiten und grundlegende Unterschiede. In: Öffentlich-Private Daseinsvorsorge (ÖPD) in Deutschland. essentials. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31100-1_2 (дата обращения: 21.05.2021).

32. Promoting People first Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) for the UN SDGs. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. July 2016 URL: https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Promoting-People-first-Public-Private- Partnerships-PPPs-for-the-UN-SDGs_UNECE_IATF-Issue-Brief.pdf (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).

33. Руководящие принципы в области государственно-частных партнерств на благо людей в поддержку Целей Организации Объединенных Наций в области устойчивого развития. Европейская экономическая комиссия. Женева, 25-27 марта 2019 года. URL: http://staging2.unece.org.net4all.ch/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/ppp/Standards/ECE_CECI_2019_05-ru.pdf (дата обращения: 29.03.2021).