Mistakes and quasi mistakes in applying the criminal law: causes and consequences

Objective: to identify the causes of mistakes and quasi-mistakes in applying criminal law; to establish consequences of un- substantiated illegal law-enforcement decisions made by interrogators, investigators, prosecutors, and judges due to mistakes and quasi-mistakes; to elaborate proposals aimed at preventing these mistakes and quasi-mistakes.Methods: analytical, dialectical, dogmatic, documentary, logical, practical, and systematic.Results: the concepts of “mistake in applying criminal law” and “quasi-mistake in applying criminal law” are defined; the causes of the mentioned mistakes and quasi-mistakes are identified; the most harmful consequences are identified, which are related to unsubstantiated illegal law-enforcement decisions made by interrogators, investigators, prosecutors, and judges due to mistakes and quasi-mistakes at law-enforcement and managerial levels of implementing the criminal legal policy of the state; the proposals are formulated to enshrine in the legislation the duty of the law enforcement officer to be responsible for a mistake or quasi-mistake in decision-making and for the negative consequences that have arisen, as well as the proposal to exclude such a duty due to objective circumstances.Scientific novelty: the article for the first time a) defines the concept of “a mistake in applying criminal law” as a neglect in the investigative and judicial practice, inaccuracy, distortion, flaw when classifying a deed under the criminal law, as well as when using the criminal legal measures. Also, b) the author gives the definition of “a quasi-mistake in applying criminal law” as a deliberate making of an illegal, unsubstantiated decision. The reasons of the mentioned mistakes or quasi-mistakes are identified: a) complexity of the specific situations that must be overcome by applying the criminal law; b) low professional level of law enforcers; c) negligence in carrying out the investigation/judicial proceedings due to personal qualities, disruption of work, excessive workload; d) impact on decision making of conjuncture circumstances, opinions/orders of the law-enforcement body’s authority, other officials or other persons. The most harmful consequences of unsubstantiated illegal law-enforcement decisions made by law-enforcers due to mistakes and quasi-mistakes are identified: a) devaluation of the criminal law; b) degradation of the investigative and judicial system; c) the loss of people’s faith in the validity of the state authorities’ decisions, decency of the authorities, and justice.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions should be used to improve the investigative and judicial activities at law-enforcement and managerial levels when implementing the criminal law policy of the state.

уголовное право и криминология, уголовный закон, ошибка, квазиошибка, причина, последствие, правоприменитель, уголовное дело

1. Ожегов С. И., Шведова Н. Ю. Толковый словарь русского языка. 3-е изд., стереотипное. М.: АЗЪ, 1995. 928 с.

2. Большой толковый словарь русского языка. СПб.: Норинт, 2000. 1536 с.

3. Большой энциклопедический словарь. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Большая Российская энциклопедия; СПб.: Норинт, 2000. 1456 с.

4. Приказ Судебного департамента при Верховном суде РФ от 09.06.2011 № 112 «Об утверждении Перечня документов федеральных судов общей юрисдикции с указанием сроков хранения».

5. Уголовное дело № 83023 от 07.01.1999 СО Канавинского РУВД г. Н. Новгорода, прекращенное 07.04.1999. Л.д. 366.

6. Постановление ОППН ОВД г. Шадринска от 17.04.1998 об отказе в возбуждении уголовного дела в отношении А. А. Уфимцева, В. В. Стукова, С. Н. Сальникова.

7. Уголовное дело № 52003 от 10.12.1997 СО Ивановского ЛОВДТ г. Иваново, прекращенное 10.03.1998. Л.д. 120.

8. Уголовное дело № 83261 от 13.02.1999 СО Канавинского РУВД г. Н. Новгорода, прекращенное 10.04.1999. Л.д. 363.

9. Уголовное дело № 12461 от 17.08.1998 СО УВД г. Костромы.

10. Уголовное дело № 44750 от 10.07.2004 СУ при УВД г. Арзамаса, прекращенное 01.12.2004. Л.д. 133-134.

11. Уголовное дело № 44125 от 10.04.2004 СУ при УВД г. Арзамаса, прекращенное 28.07.2004.

12. Уголовное дело № 230582 от 13.03.2005 СУ при УВД г. Арзамаса, прекращенное 07.04.2005. Л.д. 36-38.

13. Уголовное дело № 35060 Кстовского РУВД г. Кстово, прекращенное 17.03.1998 за отсутствием в деянии состава преступления.

14. Определение Судебной коллегии по уголовным делам Верховного суда РФ от 28.12.2017 № 67-АПУ17-24 по делу Г. // Бюллетень Верховного суда РФ. 2018. № 10. С. 14.

15. Постановление Президиума Верховного суда РФ № 156-П16 по делу П. // Бюллетень Верховного суда РФ. 2018. № 1. С. 31.

16. Бюллетень Верховного суда РФ. 2010. № 1. С. 1.