FUNCTIONING OF CONVICTION CONSEQUENCES IN TIME AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION
Abstract
Objective: to prove that in some cases the consequences of a criminal conviction do not stop with its discharge and remission; to offer their classification, and make a proposal to the current criminal law. Methods: universal dialectic method of knowledge; gneral scientific, special and private legal methods. Results: it is proved that the action of the consequences of a criminal conviction is not always limited to the discharge and remission of a criminal record, and depending on their actions in time they can be classified into fixed-term, indefinite-term and permanent (life-long). To eliminate the contradictions with the legislative wording on the urgency of the conviction consequences, a proposal is made on amendments in Article 86 of the Criminal Code. Scientific novelty: for the first time in the theory of the Russian criminal law classification of the actions of the conviction consequences in time is made. Practical value: the results of research that improve the view of the legal nature of criminal convictions, may be used for perfection of the criminal legislation, and in the educational process.
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure:
The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Article info:
Date submitted: 11.10.2021
Published: 30.12.2013
The author has read and approved the final manuscript.
Peer review info:
"Russian Journal of Economics and Law" thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Editorial comment:
In case of any discrepancies in a text or the differences in its layout between the pdf-version of an article and its html-version the priority is given to the pdf-version.
References
1. Голина В. В. Погашение и снятие судимости по советскому уголовному праву. – Харьков: Вища школа, 1979. – 137 с
2. Габдрахманов Ф. Погашение и снятие судимости при условно-досрочном освобождении от отбывания наказания: проблемы правоприменения // Уголовное право. – 2010. – № 6. – С. 17–26
3. Малков В. П. Погашение и снятие судимости при осуждении по совокупности преступлений и приговоров // Вестник ТИСБИ. – 2001. – № 1. – URL: law.edu.ru/doc/document.asp?docID=1216629 (дата обращения: 12.10.2012)
4. Уголовное право Российской Федерации. Общая и Особенная части: учебник / Т. Б. Басова, Е. В. Благов, П. В. Головненков и др.; под ред. А. И. Чучаева. – М.: КОНТРАКТ, ИНФРА-М, 2013. – 704 с
5. Елинский А. В. Неуголовно-правовые последствия прежней судимости в свете решений Конституционного Суда РФ // Журнал российского права. – 2010. – № 7. – С. 78–84
6. Белоцерковский С. Д. Совершенствование института судимости как одно из необходимых условий оптимизации борьбы с организованной преступностью // Российский следователь. – 2010. – № 12. – С. 17–19
For citations:
Gabdrakhmanov F.V.
FUNCTIONING OF CONVICTION CONSEQUENCES IN TIME AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION. Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2013;(4):241-246.
(In Russ.)
Views:
134