MECHANISMS OF DISCRETIONARY FISCAL POLICY IMPLEMENTATION AT SUBFEDERAL LEVEL

Objective: to identify new approaches to implementation of effective discretionary fiscal policy to stimulate socio-economic development at the subfederal level. Methods: the study used comparative methods of economic analysis and logic synthesis. The basic methodological principles were used, like dialectical approach to the cognition of socio-economic phenomena in the area of discretionary fiscal policy at the subfederal level, in the context of the comprehensive objective and subjective factors, as well as the methodological principle - the unity of historical and logical, systematic approach to economic phenomena and processes of mechanisms formation for the implementation of discretionary fiscal policy. Results: the diagnostics is conducted of the current socio-economic processes in the region, implemented by the Tatarstan executive bodies of state power and administration of discretionary policy in the sphere of agriculture, the economic levers are considered that determine the mechanisms of maneuvering of the regional budget expenses that affect the acceleration of socio-economic development. Scientific novelty: the paper presents new approaches to the formation of mechanisms for the effective implementation of discretionary policy at the subfederal level. Practical value: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific and pedagogical activity when considering the issues of the nature and trends of modern discretionary fiscal policy.

regional discretionary policy, the maneuvering of budget expenditures, program-target method of budget planning, socio-economic development, regions of Russia, agriculture, farmers, Russian Federation, Republic of Tatarstan

1. Kopits G., Symansky S.A. Fiscal policy rules // International monetary fund, 1998.

2. Buti M., Giudice G. Maastricht’s fiscal rules at ten: an assessment // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2002, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 823-848.

3. Spilimbergo, M.A. et al. Fiscal policy for the crisis // International Monetary Fund, 2009.

4. Kneebone, R.D., McKenzie, K.J. Electoral and partisan cycles in fiscal policy: An examination of Canadian provinces // International Tax and Public Finance, 2001, vol. 8, no. 5-6, pp. 753-774.

5. Decentralization, fiscal discipline in sub-national governments and the bailout problem: The case of Argentina // Interamerican Development Bank, 2002.

6. Debrun X. et al. Tied to the mast? National fiscal rules in the European Union // Economic Policy, 2008, vol. 23, no. 54, pp. 297-362.

7. Anderson B., Minarik J.J. Design choices for fiscal policy rules // OECD journal on budgeting, 2005, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 159.

8. Braun M., Gresia L. Towards effective social insurance in Latin America: the importance of countercyclical fiscal policy, 2003.

9. Baunsgaard T., Symansky S. A. Automatic fiscal stabilizers. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2009.

10. Bordo M.D., Jonung L., Markiewicz A. A fiscal union for the euro: Some lessons from history // CESifo Economic Studies, 2013.

11. Kopits M.G. Rules-based fiscal policy in emerging markets // International Monetary Fund, 2013.

12. Ferreiro J., Gуmez C., Serrano F. Conditions for a Sustainable Counter-Cyclical Fiscal Policy: The Case of Spain // Journal of Economic Issues. 2014, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 341-348.

13. Jia X. et al. The development of agriculture and its impact on cultural expansion during the late Neolithic in the Western Loess Plateau, China // The Holocene, 2013, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 85-92.

14. Conway G.R., Barbier E.B. After the green revolution: sustainable agriculture for development. Routledge, 2013.

15. Singh Y.P. et al. Crop-livestock interaction to food security and sustainable development of agriculture for small and marginal farmers in northwest India // The Journal of Rural and Agricultural Research, 2011, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 6-13.

16. Martel F. et al. Development of agriculture left-overs: fine organic chemicals from wheat hemicellulose-derived pentoses // Carbohydrates in Sustainable Development I. 2010, pp. 79-115.

17. McClellan J., King M.C. Genetic heterogeneity in human disease // Cell, 2010, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 210-217.

18. Carolan M. et al. The sociology of food and agriculture. Routledge, 2012.

19. Jacobsen E., Beers P.J., Fischer A.R. H. Inventions for future sustainable development in agriculture // The TransForum Model: Transforming Agro Innovation Toward Sustainable Development, 2011, pp. 21-39.

20. Bettinger R., Richerson P., Boyd R. Constraints on the development of agriculture // Current Anthropology, 2009, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 627-631.

21. Liu P., Zhang X. Investigation into evaluation of agriculture informatization level based on two-tuple // Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2011, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 74-86.

22. Zhongfu S., Du Keming Y.S. Development Trend of Internet of Things and Perspective of Its Application in Agriculture [J] // Agriculture Network Information, 2010, vol. 5, pp. 5-8.

23. Roy R., Chan N.W. A Multi-Level Evaluation of Policy Integration of Human Resource Development in Agriculture Sector // Natural Resources, 2014, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 119.

24. Rehman A. Role of technology for sustainable development of agriculture in rohilkhand of UP, 2014.

25. Jensen E. Danish Agriculture Its Economic Development. 2009. 407 p.

26. Choenkwan, S., Fox, J.M., Rambo, A.T. Agriculture in the Mountains of Northeastern Thailand: Current Situation and Prospects for Development. Mountain Research and Development, 2014, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 95-106.