IDENTIFICATION OF RISK OF CORRUPTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL NANOECONOMICS

Objective: to develop a methodology for identifying the types and subtypes of economic activities at risk of environmental corruption in Russia.Methods of research: the typology of the interaction of meso- and nanoeconomic systems in the context of environmental risk of corruption on the basis of a comparison of the results of correlation and regression analysis of the influence the net financial result of activity of organizations and average monthly nominal accrued wages of employees of organizations on the volume of emissions of pollutants from stationary sources in terms of types and subtypes of economic activity in Russia. Research results: the approach to the organization of countering corruption in the context of the author's concept of the ecological nanoeconomics; developed a method of economic and mathematical analysis of environmental risk of corruption; justified composition of the array of statistical indicators to empirically underpin the author's approach towards the fight against environmental corruption; identified types and subtypes of economic activity, the environmental risk of corruption in Russia; the perspective development of the author's approaches to corruption prevention in Russia and other countries of the world. Scientific novelty: the notion of «nanoeconomics» was first introduced to the scientific and deterministic definition of«environmental nanoeconomics», demonstrated the introduction of the following concepts - «nanoeconomics of enter- prise», «nanoeconomics project», «nanoeconomics of the region», «nanoeconomics of the country»; it defines the essence of corruption in the context of dialectics of interrelation of interests of nanoeconomics with the interests of micro-, meso-, macro- and megaeconomics; the developed approach on the application of economic-mathematical methods for the early diagnosis of environmental corruption.Practical value: approach to application of economic-mathematical methods for the early diagnosis of environmental cor- ruption it is advisable to use within pedagogical, research and analysis, and to develop guidelines for diagnosing the risk of corruption; the approbation of the author's methodology of identification of types and subtypes of economic activity, the environmental risk of corruption in Russia, will allow to improve the quality of anti-corruption measures in the implementa- tion of environmental policy of Russia and other countries of the world.

nanoeconomics environmental, environmental corruption, diagnosis of corruption, economic and mathemati- cal analysis

1. Treisman, D. The causes of corruption: a cross-national study // Journal of public economics, 2000, no. 76 (3), pp. 399-457.

2. Arrow, K. J. Reflections on the Essays. Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy, 1987, p. 734.

3. Klejner, G. B. Sovremennaja rossijskaja jekonomika kak «jekonomika fizicheskih lic» // Voprosy jekonomiki, 1996, no. 4.

4. Lopez, R., Mitra, S. Corruption, pollution, and the Kuznets environment curve. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2000, no. 40 (2), pp. 137-150.

5. Welsch, H. Corruption, growth, and the environment: a cross-country analysis. Environment and Development Econom- ics, 2004, no. 9 (05), pp. 663-693.

6. Pellegrini, L. Corruption and Environmental Policies: What Are the Implications for the Enlarged EU? // In Corrup- tion, Development and the Environment, 2011, pp. 101-119. Springer Netherlands.

7. Cole, M. A. Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis // Ecological Economics, 2007, no. 62 (3), pp. 637-647.

8. Morse, S. Is corruption bad for environmental sustain- ability? A cross-national analysis // Ecology and Society, 2006,

9. (1), p. 22.

10. Bhattacharyya, S., Hodler, R. Natural resources, democ- racy and corruption // European Economic Review, 2010, no.

11. (4), pp. 608-621.

12. Kolstad, I., Sjoreide, T. Corruption in natural resource management: Implications for policy makers // Resources Policy, 2009, 34 (4), pp. 214-226.

13. Kolstad, I., Wiig, A. Is transparency the key to reduc- ing corruption in resource-rich countries? // World Develop- ment, 2009, no. 37 (3), pp. 521-532.

14. Robbins, P. The rotten institution: corruption in natural resource management // Political Geography, 2000, no. 19 (4), pp. 423-443.

15. Brunnschweiler, C. N. Cursing the blessings? // Natural resource abundance, institutions and economic growth. World development, 2008, no. 36 (3), pp. 399-419.

16. Auty, R. M. The political economy of resource-driven growth // European economic review, 2001, no. 45 (4), pp. 839-846.

17. The varieties of resource experience: natural resource export structures and the political economy of economic growth / J. Isham, M. Woolcock, L. Pritchett, G. Busby // The World Bank Economic Review, 2005, no. 19 (2), pp. 141-174.

18. Leite, C. A., Weidmann J. Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption and economic growth, 1999, June. IMF Working Paper, (99/85).

19. Norman, C. S. Rule of law and the resource curse: abun- dance versus intensity // Environmental and Resource Econom- ics, 2009, no. 43 (2), pp. 183-207.

20. Salimov, L. N. The concept of greening the national economy and the mechanism of its implementation in Russia / Proceedings of 13th International Conference of the Russian Society for Ecological Economics RSEE-2015 Natural Resource Management and Environmental Protection: Theory and Practice of Economic Regulation (Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, July 7-11, 2015), pp. 171-183.