BASIC CONTRADICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTION COOPERATION
https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.09.2015.4.188-197
Abstract
Objective: to analyze the contradictions of international industrial cooperation as a driving force for its development.Methods: identification and analysis of contradictions in international cooperation were carried out using systematic approach based on general scientific methods of theoretical and empirical research: analysis, synthesis, scientific observation, measurement and comparison. On the basis of generalization and analysis of the information contained in the statistical system of the Organization for economic cooperation and development and the global competitiveness reports of the world economic forum, the author presents assessment of the level of technological and knowledge- intensity of the economies of certain developed and developing (transition) countries, investment efficiency in science and research, their influence on the technological level of production and the degree of technological sovereignty of the mentioned countries.Results: the study of the industrialized countries’ experience has shown that the production of high-tech products is impossible without integration into a global cooperative network of industrial companies and research institutes. However, being included into the global production chains and attracting advanced technologies of production, marketing and management, the national companies inevitably fall into dependence on foreign (import) supply.An economic axiom is formulated: modern high-tech production requires a dramatic expansion of international production cooperation.The main ontological contradiction of international industrial cooperation is revealed, characterized by the impact on the improvement of the technological level of production and innovativeness of the national economy, on the one hand, and simultaneous strengthening of its dependence on foreign partners, on the other hand.Scientific novelty: on the basis of systematic approach, the article reveals contradictions in international cooperation in the context of innova- tive development and economic security of the country; the basic contradiction of international industrial cooperation is formulated; it is proved that the resolution/mitigation of the main contradiction is due to the development of the national innovation system.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in the development of recommendations to reduce the level of contradictions in international cooperation, and to weaken the dependence of the Russian industry from imports.
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure:
The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Article info:
Date submitted: 12.10.2021
Published: 30.12.2015
The author has read and approved the final manuscript.
Peer review info:
"Russian Journal of Economics and Law" thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Editorial comment:
In case of any discrepancies in a text or the differences in its layout between the pdf-version of an article and its html-version the priority is given to the pdf-version.
References
1. Галушко М. В. Внешнеторговая деятельность предприятий в рамках международной производственной кооперации // Вестник Оренбургского государственного университета. 2007. № 8. С. 41-45.
2. Клочков В. В., Русанова А. Л. Международная кооперация в сфере прикладных исследований и национальные интересы России (на примере авиастроения) // Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность. 2012. № 40. С. 12-24.
3. Соболев Л. Б. Горизонтальная интеграция или конгломерация? // Экономический анализ: теория и практика. 2015. № 24 (423). С. 2-11.
4. Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, Basic Books, 1984, 9 p.
5. Мезоэкономика развития / под ред. Г. Б. Клейнера. М.: Наука, 2011. 805 с.
6. Freeman C. The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1995. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 5-24.
7. Иванова Н. Наука и инновации: выбор приоритетов // Мир перемен. 2013. № 1. С. 84-88.
8. Elvers D., Song C. R&D Cooperation and Firm Performance - Evaluation of Partnering Strategies in the Automotive Industry // Journal of Finance and Economics. 2014. Vol. 2. No. 5. P. 185-193.
9. Каукин А., Фрейнкман Л. Структура и продуктивность российского экспорта // Экономическая политика. 2009. № 5. С. 99-117.
10. Conway E. 50 Economics Ideas. London, Quercus, 2009, 208 p.
Views:
223