SUCCESS FACTORS OF AN ENTERPRISE UNDER CRISIS

Objective: to analyze the impact of economic crisis in Russia on the enterprises’ access to productive resources, as well as on the level of their competencies.Methods: historical, abstract-logical.Results: the article states that, despite the influence of external factors, the main activities of the company are internal capabilities and resources of the firm. It is shown that under crisis a company must adapt to the limited resources, i.e. change the competences of using them. Under modern conditions the competitive advantage can be based on two components - access to resources and internal ability of the company to use them. Therefore, under the resource constraints such competencies should be generated as: 1) ability to use a smaller amount of resources; 2) more efficient use of available resources; 3) search for the new resources, development of own resources.The study determined that the acquisition of new competencies by the company will be associated with the use and improvement of its cognitive capabilities, which are a function of organizational and individual knowledge possessed by the enterprise, i.e. its intellectual capital.The article analyses the experience of development of new competencies under crisis by the example of reorganization of "Prompribor" plant and activities of "Galogen" JSC. Analysis of the experience of these companies, which not only survived during the crisis, but also acquired new competences and skills, have led to the conclusion that the key role in this process was played by working with the main part of a company's intellectual capital, i.e. human capital. Thus, a conclusion is made about the value of people and their common interests during the transformations within the enterprise.Scientific novelty: for the first time the cognitive aspects of the enterprises’ modernization system are considered from the viewpoint of the new resource and competence theory of the enterprise.Practical significance: the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in the development or adjustment of the enterprises’ modernization strategy under economic crisis.

экономика и управление народным хозяйством, кризис, предприятия, ресурсы, компетенции, стратегия

1. Клейнер Г. Б. Теория фирмы - стратегия предприятия - микроэкономическая политика государства // Вестник Российского гуманитарного научного фонда. 2013. № 4. C. 73.

2. Сквозь призму кризиса: роль советов директоров российских компаний. Опрос членов советов директоров российских компаний за 2015 год // PwC. 2015. URL: http://www.pwc.ru/ru/governance-risk-compliance/assets/rbs_2015_ru.pdf (дата обращения: 24.09.2016).

3. Lewis M., Brandon-Jones A., Slack N., Howard M. Competing through operations and supply: the role of classic and extended resource-based advantage // International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2010. Vol. 30, No. 10. Pp. 1032-1058.

4. Barney J. B., Tyler B. The attributes of top management teams and sustained competitive advantage // Managing the high technology firms. JAI Press, Nueva York, 1990.

5. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage // Journal of management. 1991. Vol. 17, No. 1. Pp. 99-120.

6. Coff R. W. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power // Organization science. 1999. Vol. 10, No. 2. Pp. 119-133.

7. Пирс II Д., Робинсон Р. Стратегический менеджмент. СПб.: Питер, 2013. 560 с.

8. McKee D. O., Varadarajan P. R., Pride W. M. Strategic adaptability and firm performance: a market-contingent perspective // The Journal of Marketing. 1989. Pp. 21-35.

9. Kraatz M. S., Zajac E. J. How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence // Organization Science. 2001. Vol. 12, No. 5. Pp. 632-657.

10. Васильева В. Стратегические ресурсы и компетенции в рамках стратегического потенциала организации // Российский экономический интернет-журнал. 2009.

11. Zott C. Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study // Strategic management journal. 2003. Vol. 24, No. 2. Pp. 97-125.

12. Oktemgil M., Greenley G. Consequences of high and low adaptive capability in UK companies // European Journal of Marketing. 1997. Vol. 31, No. 7. Pp. 445-466.

13. McConnell C., Brue S. Economics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.

14. Савчук В. П. Управление предприятием в условиях кризиса: что делать, если случился кризис // Экономика и менеджмент. Стратегия + Финансы: базовые знания для руководителей. М.: БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний, 2012. C. 302.

15. Оно Т. Производственная система Тойоты: уходя от массового производства. ИКСИ, 2005. 192 с.

16. Гэлбрейт Д. К. Экономические теории и цели общества. М.: Прогресс, 1979. 390 с.

17. Prajogo D. I., Oke A. Human capital, service innovation advantage, and business performance: The moderating roles of dynamic and competitive environments // International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2016. Vol. 36, No. 9. Pp. 974-994.

18. Stefano Zambon D., Dumay J. A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: from reporting to disclosure // Journal of Intellectual capital. 2016. Vol. 17, No. 1. Pp. 168-184.

19. Choo C. W., Bontis N. The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. Oxford University Press, 2002. 768 с.

20. Stewart T., Ruckdeschel C. Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Wiley Online Library, 1998.

21. Brooking A. Intellectual capital. Cengage Learning EMEA, 1996. 204 с.

22. Sveiby K. E. The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1997.

23. Coleman J. S. Foundations of social theory // Cambridge MA (Belnkamp). 1990. Р. 993.

24. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital // Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education / ed. Richardson J. New York, NY: Greenwood Press, 1986. Pp. 46-58.

25. Putnam R. D. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital // Journal of democracy. 1995. Vol. 6, No. 1. Pp. 65-78.

26. Lins K. V., Servaes H., Tamayo A. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis, 2016.

27. Barroso-Castro C., Villegas-Periñan M. d. M., Casillas-Bueno J. C. How boards’ internal and external social capital interact to affect firm performance // Strategic Organization. 2016. Vol. 14, No. 1. Pp. 6-31.

28. Baker W. E., Grinstein A., Harmancioglu N. Whose innovation performance benefits more from external networks: entrepreneurial or conservative firms? // Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2016. Vol. 33, No. 1. Pp. 104-120.

29. Thomson K. Emotional capital: Maximising the intangible assets at the heart of brand and business success. Capstone, 2001.

30. Edvinsson L., Malone M. S. Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower, 1997.

31. Гапоненко А. Л., Орлова Т. М. Управление знаниями. Как превратить знания в капитал. М.: Эксмо, 2008. 400 c.

32. Ляпунов С. И. Стратегическое планирование - дань моде или необходимость? // Стратегическое планирование и развитие предприятия: тезисы докладов и сообщений Первого всероссийского симпозиума. Москва, 11-12 апреля 2000 г. / под ред. Г. Б. Клейнера. М.: ЦЭМИ РАН, 2000.

33. Клейнер Г. Б., Хайниш С., Баранов П., Ляпунов С. Развитие малого бизнеса на основе реорганизации крупных предприятий. М.: КОНСЭКО, 1998. 144 с.

34. Ляпунов С., Лузин А. Реструктуризация предприятий в период переходной экономики. Как снизить социальные потери и рационально передавать опыт? URL: http://altrc.ru/library/27/481/ (дата обращения: 15.10.2016).

35. Гончар К. Р., Голикова В. В. Инновационное поведение предприятия: ОАО «Галоген» // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2009. T. 7, № 3. C. 113-138.