Model Risks in the Financial Sphere under the Conditions of the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2022.1.40-50
EDN: XEFPBE
Abstract
Objective: within the framework of RegTech and SupTech technologies, to assess the transformation of model risks and ways to minimize them under the increasing use of artificial intelligence methods.
Methods: a systematic approach to the analysis of the quality of economic models. Historical, logical, and statistical methods of research.
Results: the Russian and foreign experience of accounting for model risks in the financial industry is considered. Theoretical and practical works on the regulation and management of model risks in the activities of financial sector organizations are studied. The role of machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies in solving the modern problems in the functioning and regulation of financial organizations is determined. The key model risks are considered, as well as the directions of changing their specifics as a result of the artificial intelligence technologies development, primarily machine learning, and increasing the capabilities for storage and transmission of a large amount of data. The main methods of data processing and model construction are considered, as well as their advantages in terms of reducing model risks. It is determined that the reduction of model risks using RegTech and SupTech technologies is possible due to the development of artificial intelligence technologies, which will require, among other things, the elaboration of the appropriate legal field.
Scientific novelty: the unique feature of the article is a comprehensive consideration of the problem of model risks in the finance industry and of the impact of artificial intelligence technologies on them in mathematical, legal, economic aspects, as well as the description of the situation in this area both abroad and in Russia.
Practical significance: the information presented in the article can be used by regulatory authorities and commercial banks in the tasks related to minimizing specific model risks in their activities.
Supporting agencies: Financial Support: The work was carried out with the financial support of RFBR, grant № 20-510-00009 Bel_a «Transformation of the monetary regulation system of Russia and Belarus under the economy digitalization».
About the Author
I. L. Kirilyuk
Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor L. Kirilyuk, Researcher
Web of Science Researcher ID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/T-6301-2017,
eLIBRARY ID: SPIN-код: 5931-1402,
AuthorID: 39374
Moscow
References
1. Mark, R., Galai, D., Crouhy, M. (2015). Bases of risk management. Moscow, Yurajt (in Russ.).
2. Derman, E. (1996). Model risk quantitative strategies research notes (April ed.). New York, Goldman Sachs & Co.
3. Danielsson, J., James, K. R., Valenzuela, M., Zer, I. (2016). Model risk of risk models, Journal of Financial Stability, 23, 79–91.
4. Timoshenko, Ph. S. (2016). Controlling model risk: best practices in financial modeling in budgeting process, Gosudarstvennyj audit. Pravo. Ekonomika, 1, 37–42 (in Russ.).
5. Bedredinov, R. T. (2014). Bank operational risk management (1 ed.). Moscow, Onebook.ru (in Russ.).
6. Basel committee on banking supervision. (June 2006). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. A revised framework comprehensive version.
7. The Deloitte center for regulatory strategy. (2018). Model risk management. Building supervisory confidence.
8. Dodgson, M., Ciais, F., Georgiev, K. D. (2020). Model risk management of AI and machine learning systems. PwC.
9. Agarwala, G., Latorre, A., Raffel, S., Mehta, R., Zhao, J., Nurullayev, A., Clark, B., Tang, R. (2020). Supervisory expectations and sound model risk management practices for artificial intelligence and machine learning. EY.
10. Ni, A. (2016). Model risk management. A sound practice for meeting current chalenges, KPMG.
11. Morini, M. (2011). Understanding and Managing Model Risk: A Practical Guide for Quants, Traders and Validators. Wiley.
12. Tunaru, R. (2015). Model risk in financial markets: from financial engineering to risk management. World Scientific.
13. Meyer, Ch., Quell, P. (2020). Risk Model Validation (3rd ed.).
14. Christodoulakis, G., Satchell, S. (2007). The Analytics of Risk Model Validation. Academic Press.
15. Sheule, H., Rösch, D. (2010). Model Risk: Identification, Measurement and Management. Risk Books.
16. Bityuckij, V., Patratij, O., Perevickaya, V., Pisarenko, V., CHernyshev, O. (2013). Validation. Moscow, Komitet po standartam Basel II i upravleniyu riskami (in Russ.).
17. Aleskerov, F. T., Andrievskaya, I. K., Penikas, G. I., Solodkov, V. M. (2013). Analysis of mathematical models Bazel II (2nd ed.). Moscow, FIZMATLIT (in Russ.).
18. Lobanov, A. A., Chugunov, A. V. (eds.) (2003). Encyclopedia of financial risk management. Moscow, Alpina Pablisher (in Russ.).
19. Nesterenok, G. (2021). Managing the model risk, Bankauskі vesnik: informacionno-analiticheskij i nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal Nacional'nogo banka Respubliki Belarus, 4 (693), 31–38 (in Russ.).
20. Doerr, S., Gambacorta, L., Serena, J. M. (2021, March). Big data and machine learning in central banking, BIS Working Papers, 930. Bank for International Settlements.
21. Gasanova, A. G., Medvedev, A. N., Komockij, E. (2018). Revealing terrorism and money laundering funding with intellectual data analysis, XII International conference “Russian regions in the focus of changes”. Yekaterinburg, 16–18 November 2017: collection of works (pp. 154–166). Ekaterinburg, Izdatel'stvo UMC UPI, 2018, Ch. 1. (in Russ.).
22. Kirilyuk, I. L. (2020). Methods of intellectual data analysis and regulation of the digital transformation of the financial sector in Russia and the world, The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4, 152–165 (in Russ.).
23. Gorban, A. N. (2020). Errors of a data-based intellect. In Collection of works of the International conference “Intellectual systems in science and technology” and the 6th All-Russia scientific-practical conference “Artificial intelligence in solving the topical social and economic problems of the 21st century” (Perm, 12–18 October 2020). Permskij gosudarstvennyj nacional'nyj issledovatel'skij universitet, Perm.
24. Taleb, N. N. (2012). The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable (2d ed.). Moscow, Azbuka-Attikus (in Russ.).
25. Kirilyuk, I. L., Senko, O. V. (2020). Choosing the optimally complex models by Monte-Carlo methods (by the example of the production functions models of the Russian regios), Informatika i ee primeneniya, 14 (2), 111–118 (in Russ.).
26. Lapach, S. N., Radchenko, S. G. (2012). Main problems of constructing regression models, Matematichnі mashini і sistemi, 4, 125–133 (in Russ.).
27. Bag, D. Model validation under Basel II. (2010). CRO. Finsight-Media (pp. 10–15).
28. Belkin, M., Hsu, D., Ma, S., Mandal, S. (2019). Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 32 (116), 15849–15854.
29. Dedova, M. (2018). A comparison of time-series bootstrap methods in terms of backtesting risk measurement models of banks, The HSE Economic Journal, 22 (1), 84–109 (in Russ.).
30. Afanas'ev, S., Kotereva, D., Starodub, K. (2021). MPP-challenge: modeling the model quality prognosis. In Collection of professional works of the 9th intersectoral conference Scoring Day (pp. 10–21) (in Russ.).
31. Zamyatin, A. V. (2020). Intellectual data analysis, tutorial. Tomsk: Izdatel'skij dom Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kirilyuk I.L. Model Risks in the Financial Sphere under the Conditions of the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2022;16(1):40-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2022.1.40-50. EDN: XEFPBE
Views:
589
Email this article 
