Role of Cinematography in Anticorruption Enlightenment: Global Experience

Objective: to conduct a comprehensive interdisciplinary legal study of the role of cinematography in anti-corruption enlightenment of citizens.

Methods: a structural and functional approach to the interpretation of society as a connection of subsystems, in which cinematography is a part of the cultural subsystem, while anti-corruption policy refers simultaneously to the public subsystem (enlightenment) and the state subsystem (politics). The chosen approach determines a set of specific research methods, such as a critical analysis of theoretical literature on corruption behavior and on the relationship between a viewer and a cinematography product in conjunction with an empirical study of various cases in the form of films and film projects devoted to anti-corruption topics.

Results: the analysis of the mechanisms of building the relationships between a viewer and cinematography allowed identifying the possibilities of cinematography to have a long-term impact on a viewer, due not only to the technical capabilities of cinematography, but also to the psychobiological mechanisms of man. By the example of specific projects, the expediency of using cinema as an anti-corruption enlightenment tool was proved and justified. In particular, if the relevant messages are laid in the plot of a feature film, then, thanks to mirror neurons and human thinking mechanisms, they can serve educational purposes and demonstrate the consequences of corrupt behavior. It is important not to intimidate the audience with the horrors of living with corruption, but to show a positive way out and scenarios of living without it. This can lead to an increase in civic engagement, to an increase in interest in the issue under discussion, as well as to an increase in ratings of trust in the state.

Scientific novelty: the article proves the inexpediency of evaluating cinema solely as a form of entertainment, and for the first time examines examples of the practical application of cinema for anti-corruption policy and enlightenment by comparing approaches used in different countries.

Practical significance: the main conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, pedagogical and practical activities when developing long-term strategies and programs of anti-corruption enlightenment, as well as in the framework of cinematographic activities to assess the long-term consequences of the demonstrated film narrative.

1. Desbarats, F. (2021). High-school cinema curricula: Evidence of new trends in education. Film Education Journal, 4 (2), 125–135.

2. Finckenauer, J., Waring, E. (1998). Russian mafia in America: immigration, culture, and crime. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

3. Roy, A. (2007). Dictionnaire général du cinéma. Du cinématographe à Internet. Québec, Fides.

4. Eizenshtein, S. M. (2021). Behind the scenes. Key works of the film theory. 2d ed. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt.

5. El'zesser, T., Khagener, M. (2018). Film theory. An introduction through the senses. Saint Petersburg, Seans.

6. Gallese, V. (2003). The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36 (4), 171–180.

7. The Kuleshov effect. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwMRtWNEQRo.

8. Belodubrovskaya, M. (2020). Going wrong. Cinematography under Stalin. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

9. Atkinson, J., Bulbulia, F. (2021). Children coping with COVID-19: Intersectional understandings of Film and media access in a crisis. Film Education Journal, 4 (1), 29–43.

10. Widojoko, J. D. (2017). Indonesia’s anticorruption campaign: civil society versus the political cartel. The changing face of corruption in the Asia Pacific (pp. 253–265). Elsevier.

11. Mufti, H. R., Kanumayoso, B. (2018). KPK and the commitment of the Indonesian government to eradicate corruption (2004–2014). Cultural Dynamics in a Globalized World (pp. 29–37). Routledge.

12. Onishi, N. (2009, 25 July). Corruption Fighters Rouse Resistance in Indonesia. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/world/asia/26indo.html?pagewanted=all.

13. Ebang, Y. B. (2016). The Role of Mass Media in eradicating corruption. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 1 (2), 189–194.

14. Pramoto, D. A., Kriyantono, R. (2016). The Power of Media Effect: Construction Television as Media from Anti-Corruption Education in Indonesia. KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6 (1).

15. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. https://www.facebook.com/KomisiPemberantasanKorupsi.

16. KPK. https://twitter.com/kpk_ri.

17. official.kpk. https://www.instagram.com/official.kpk/.

18. KPK RI. https://www.youtube.com/user/HUMASKPK.

19. Regulasi Kompetisi Ide Cerita Film Pendek. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/acffest-2021/acffest-2022-regulasi-film-pendek.

20. Jimpitan KPK RI. (2018). ACFFest 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lj8cIl-DGU4&ab_channel=KPKRI.

21. Home sweet home KPK RI. (2019). ACFFest 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiP4l0qWDOY&t= 679s&ab_channel=KPKRI.

22. Ghaliya, G. Breaking: KPK bill passed into law. (2019, 17 Sept.). The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/09/17/breaking-kpk-bill-passed-into-law.html.

23. Heriyanto, D. (2019, 27 Sept.). No, Indonesian students are not taking to the streets only to fight sex ban. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/community/2019/09/27/no-indonesian-students-not-taking-to-streets-only-to-fight-sex-ban.html.

24. Merekina O. (2017, 26 Apr.). “On behalf of the people”: struggling corruption the Chinese way. Magazeta. https://magazeta.com/serials-corruption/.

25. Chinese official who had £24m cash at home given suspended death sentence. (2016, 17 Oct.). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/17/chinese-official-who-had-24m-cash-in-his-house-given-suspended-death-sentence.

26. Guan, B. (2019). Fighting Corruption in China Using the Media. RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, 3 (2), 55–61.

27. Linthicum, K. (2014, 3 Nov.). Mexican filmmaker Luis Estrada’s satirical agenda hits home. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-mn-luis-estrada-film-satire-20141103-story.html.

28. Thousands of Mexicans Protest Alleged Elections Fraud. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHGejrKlagY.

29. Tuckman, Jo. (2012, 26 June). Mexican media scandal: secretive Televisa unit promoted PRI candidate. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/26/mexican-media-scandal-televisa-pri-nieto.

30. Llanos, R., Romero, G. (2004, 4 March). Pescan en actos de corrupción a Bejarano. La Jornada. https://www.jornada.com.mx/2004/03/04/005n1cap.php?origen=index.html&fly=1.

31. Tadeo, J. (2014, 4 Sept.). Proactive Mexican Twitter users say #NotoCensorship in relation to a satirical film “Ideal dictatorship”. https://ru.globalvoices.org/2014/09/04/30719/.

32. Delez Zhil'. (2012). Cinema of Gilles Deleuze. Мoscow, Ad Marginem Press.

33. Lev Kuleshov about the Kuleshov effect: a fragment of a documentary “The Kuleshov effect” by Semen Raytburt (1969, Tsentrnauchfilm). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akt46Sutzvo.

34. Albéra, F. (2015). Cinéma soviétique des années 1924-1928: commande sociale/commande publique. Une histoire mondiale des cinémas de propagande (pp. 63–81). Paris, Nouveau Monde éditions.

35. Albéra, F. (2015). Cinéma soviétique des années 1924-1928: le film de montage/document, matériau, point de vue. Une histoire mondiale des cinémas de propaganda (pp. 83–91). Paris, Nouveau Monde éditions.

36. Capra, Frank. (1971). Frank Capra, The Name Above the Title: An Autobiography. New York, The Macmillan Company.

37. Ministerstvo kul'tury Rossiiskoi Federatsii, NII kinoiskusstva. (2004). Phenomenon of mass cinematography. Moscow

38. Freid Z. (1991). I and It. In Works of different years (pp. 351–392). Tbilisi, Merani.

39. Kurennoi V. (2009). Film philosophy: exercises in analysis. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.