Public procurement and innovation policy in Russia: a perspective of narrative economics

Objective: to identify narratives describing the use of public procurement system for innovation policy implementation and to critically analyze them.
Methods: quantitative analysis of the frequency of narratives, qualitative analysis of narratives to identify protomodels, institutions and social context.
Results: in the modern Russian economic system, public procurement is used as a tool for implementing the national innovation policy. The analysis of legal acts regulating public procurement of innovative and high-tech goods showed the trends that potentially reduce the variability of procuring entities' actions and the transparency of procurement procedures. Based on the tools of narrative economics, the authors analyzed the attitude of actors (representatives of the state, business and academia) of the Russian innovation system to the existing practice of public procurement in the context of the national innovation policy. As a result, the work presents a typology of public procurement problems, discussed in mass media, for Russia’s innovative development.
Scientific novelty: the considered narratives show that, in relation to the Russian innovation system, the public procurement subjects can act in the logic of the “principal-agent” theory, while the tendency to reduce transparency is welcomed by some actors.
Practical significance: institutional analysis of the recent changes in public procurement, including the rules governing the procurement of innovative and high-tech products, has revealed the devolution of formalized rules aimed at the implementation of state innovation policy. Together with the increased level of privacy in organizational activities of procuring entities, this carries the risks of not only increasing the level of opportunistic behavior of the public procurement market subjects, but also decreasing confidence in the entire public procurement system.

1. Andreev, V. (2012). The organizational-legal form of economic partnership. Economy and Law, 12, 62–66. (In Russ.).

2. Boehm, F., & Olaya, J. (2006). Corruption in public contracting auctions: the role of transparency in bidding processes. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2006.00314.x

3. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. In SpringerBriefs in Business (Vol. 7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1

4. Chiappinelli, O., Giuffrida, L. M., & Spagnolo, G. (2023). Public procurement as an innovation policy: Where do we stand? ZEW Discussion Papers, 23-002. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4343668

5. Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Martini, C., & Pennacchio, L. (2015). Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector. Research Policy, 44(3), 577–595.

6. Dezhina I., & Kiseleva V. (2007). «Triple Helix» in Russia’s Innovation System. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 123–135. (In Russ.).

7. Etzkowitz H. (2001). Triple Helix Model. Innovations, 4, 5–10. (In Russ.).

8. Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Weske, U., Bouwman, R., & Tummers, L. (2017). Public Sector Transparency. In O. James, S. Jilke, & G. Van Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in Public Management Research. Challenges and Contributions (pp. 291–312). Cambridge University Press.

9. Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (Eds.). (2014). Public procurement, innovation and policy: International perspectives. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40258-6

10. Melnikov, V. V. (2022). Efficient public procurement and the role of competition. Journal of Institutional Studies, 14(3), 119–131. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.3.119-131

11. Metcalfe, J. S. (1995). Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035307

12. Nagdalyan, D. (2020). Nature and problems of a legal form of an economic partnership. Issues of Russian Justice, 7, 247–257. (In Russ.).

13. Nemet, G. F. (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38(5), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004

14. Piga, G. (2011). A fighting chance against corruption in public procurement? In Rose-Ackerman & Søreide (Eds.), The International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Volume II. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936523.00012

15. Pokusaenko, M. A., & Volchik, V. V. (2019). Quality of Higher Education in the Context of Institutional Change. Journal of Economic Regulation, 10(2), 121–131. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2019.10.2.121-131

16. Samoylov, I. A. (2017). Economic partnership as a leader of development of corruption risks in corporate law. Journal of Business and Corporate Law, 1, 24–27. (In Russ.).

17. Shiriaev, I. M., Maskaev, A. I., & Tsygankov, S. S. (2022). Institute of intellectual property in the context of the Russian innovative system development. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 16(2), 275–293. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2022.2.275-293

18. Skvortsova, T. A., Milov, A. A., & Zaitseva, P. S. (2017). Organizational-legal forms of implementation of innovative activities. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3, 204–206. (In Russ.).

19. Soudry, O. (2007). A principal-agent analysis of accountability in public procurement. In Khi V. Thai (Ed.) Advancing public procurement: Practices, innovation and knowledge-sharing) (pp. 432–451). https://www.ippa.org/IPPC2/BOOK/Chapter_19.pdf

20. Sterledeva, L. A. (2013). Economic partnership, investment association – new forms in business activity. Bulletin of the Kurgan State Agricultural Academy, 2(6), 76–80. (In Russ.).

21. Stigler, G. J. (1964). A theory of Oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy, 72(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/258853

22. Tsygankov, S. (2022, October). Russian Public Procurement and National Innovation Policy. In Gsom Emerging Markets Conference 2022. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4445432

23. Tsygankov, S., Syropyatov, V., & Volchik, V. (2021). Institutional Governance of Innovations: Novel Insights of Leadership in Russian Public Procurement. Economies, 9(4), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9040189

24. Tsygankova, E. M. (2018). Public procurement of innovation production in Russia. Journal of Economic Regulation, 9(4), 134–145. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2018.9.4.134-145

25. Volchik V., Tsygankov S., Maskaev А. (2022). Formal Institutions of the Russian Innovation System in the Light of Narrative Economics. ECO, 10(580), 110–128. (In Russ.).

26. Volchik, V. V. (2022). To the issue of the theory and methodology of narrative economics. Issues of economic theory, 3, 31–46. (In Russ.).

27. Volchik, V. V., Maslyukova, E. V., & Panteeva, S. A. (2022). Russian innovation system in models and narratives. Journal of the New Economic Association, 2(59), 143–166. (In Russ.).

28. Volchik, V. V., Tsygankov, S. S., Fursa, E. V., Shiriaev, I. M., & Maskaev, A. I. The institutions and mechanisms of the Russian innovation system's regulation in the mirror of narratives. Journal of Economic Regulation, 13(4), 6–23. (In Russ.).

29. Volchik, V., & Maslyukova, E. (2023). Narratives about the Russian innovation system in the mass media. Terra Economicus, 21(4), 25–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-25-37

30. Volos, A. A. (2021). Business partnership: issues of theory and practice. Legal Policy and Legal Life, 1, 77–83. (In Russ.).

31. Yakovlev, А., Balaeva, О., Rodionova, Yu., & Tkachenko, А. (2020). Problems and Efficiency of Public Procurement through the Eyes of their Participants. ECO, 50(11), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2020-11-83-103