Preview

Russian Journal of Economics and Law

Advanced search

Mathematical model for analyzing the interrelation between monetary circulation and economic growth in developing countries

https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.1.981-992

EDN: YZURRZ

Abstract

Objective: to develop a basic mathematical model to assess the impact of foreign trade on the national economy and the impact of the national currency on economic growth in relation to developing countries.Methods: methods of mathematical dynamic modeling are used in the development of the model.Results: one of the most acute and unresolved problems for the Russian economy is the development of such currency-monetary policy that would provide opportunities for economic growth. One of the reasons for the ongoing disputes is the lack of a qualitative mathematical model that allows assessing its impact on economic processes. Mathematical models proposed by representatives of different economic scientific schools and describing the impact of monetization on the economy are considered. It is determined that the previously developed models are not applicable to the economies of developing countries. The characteristic is given of the dynamic mathematical model earlier developed by the authors describing cash flows in the Russian economy. The importance of models for developing economies is analyzed in terms of growth of the money supply and changes in the exchange rate of the national currency. As a result, it is determined that the constructed model, which is an aggregate version of the model of switching reproduction, takes into account the openness of the national economy and inflation processes. The model is tested on the example of currency-monetary policy of the USA and Russia. Scientific novelty: the model differs from analogues in that it is based on the modeling of cash flows in accordance with the methodology of modeling of switching reproduction, which allows analyzing the interaction of financial and real sectors of economy in developing countries.Practical significance: the model allows estimating the consequences of decisions in the field of currency-monetary policy in developing countries.

About the Authors

S. Yu. Malkov
Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


O. I. Davydova
iDecide Consulting Ltd
Russian Federation


References

1. Кудрин А. Л., Горюнов Е. Л., Трунин П. В. Стимулирующая денежно-кредитная политика: мифы и реальность // Вопросы экономики. 2017. № 5. С. 5-28.

2. Глазьев С. Ю. Нищета и блеск российских монетаристов. Ч. 2 // Экономическая наука современной России. 2015. № 3 (70). С. 7-25.

3. Титов Б. Ю. и др. Среднесрочная программа социально-экономического развития страны до 2025 года «Стратегия роста». М.: Институт экономики роста им. П. А. Столыпина, 2017.

4. Фишер И. Покупательная сила денег. М.: Дело, 2001 (1911). 320 с.

5. Греков И. Е. О совершенствовании подходов к определению монетизации экономики и обоснование ее оптимального уровня // Финансы и кредит. 2007. № 11. С. 60-70.

6. Греков И. Е. Об определении монетизации экономики и ее оптимальном уровне // Управление общественными и экономическими системами. 2006. № 3. С. 52-61.

7. Marshall A. Money, Credit and Commerce. Macmillan, London, 1923. Pp. 369.

8. Wicksell K. Lectures on political economy. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1967. Vol. 1. 326 p.

9. Кейнс Дж. М. Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. Избранное. М.: Эксмо, 2007. 960 с. ISBN 978-5-699-20989-7.

10. Studies in the quantity theory of money / ed. M. Friedman. University of Chicago Press, 1956. Vol. 561.

11. Friedman M. A theoretical framework for monetary analysis // Journal of Political Economy. 1970. Vol. 78. № 2. Pp. 193-238.

12. Friedman M. The Role of Monetary Policy // American Economic Review. 1968. № 58. Pp. 1-17.

13. Friedman M., Meiselman D. The Relative Stability of Monetary Velocity and the Investment Multiplier in the United States, 1897-1958 // Stabilization Policies / Prentice-Hall, Englewood, 1963. Pp. 165-268.

14. Friedman M., Schwartz A. J. A Monetary History of the United States. Princeton University Press, 1963. 888 p.

15. Brunner K., Friedman M. Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. 1957.

16. Hicks J. R. Mr. Keynes and the «Classics»; A Suggested Interpretation // Econometrica. 2018. Vol. 5, № 2. Pp. 147-159. DOI: 10.2307/1907242

17. Pigou A. C. The Classical Stationary State // Economic Journal. 1943. Vol. 53. № 212. Pp. 343-351.

18. Hood W. Money, Interest, and Prices: An Integration of Monetary and Value Theory. By Don Patinkin. Evanston, Ill., and White Plains, N.Y.: Row, Peterson and Company. 1956. Pp. xx, 510 // Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1958. Vol. 24, № 1. Pp. 127-130.

19. Маневич В. Е., Сабранов У. К., Некоторые направления эволюции денежной теории // Экономическая наука современной России. 2001. № 4. С. 38-51.

20. Cagan P. The Monetary Dynamics of Hyperinflation // Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money / ed. M. Friedman. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1956. Pp. 25-117.

21. Frenkel J. A. Inflation and the Formation of Expectations // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1976. Vol. 1, № 4. Pp. 403-421.

22. Goldman S. M. Hyperinflation and the Rate of Growth in the Money Supply // Journal of economic theory. 1972. Vol. 5, № 2. Pp. 250-257.

23. Hadjimichalakis M. Money, expectations, and dynamics-an alternative view // International Economic Review. 1971. Pp. 381-402.

24. Sidrauski M. Inflation and economic growth // The Journal of Political Economy. 1967. Pp. 796-810.

25. Warburton C. Depression, inflation, and monetary policy: selected papers, 1945-1953. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966. 425 p.

26. Andersen L. C., Jordan J. L. Monetary and Fiscal Actions: A Test of Their Relative Importance in Economic Stabilization // St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank Review. 1968. Vol. 50, № 1. Pp. 1-20.

27. Andersen L. C. et al. A monetarist model for economic stabilization. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 1970. P. 22.

28. Малков С. Ю., Билюга С. Э., Давыдова О. И. Монетизация российской экономики: возможности математического моделирования // Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. 2016. T. 2, № 7. C. 17-24.

29. Маевский В. И., Малков С. Ю., Рубинштейн А. А. Об эволюции моделей переключающегося режима воспроизводства // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2018. Т. 12, № 4. С. 816-827.

30. Денежные механизмы и модель переключающегося режима воспроизводства / В. И. Маевский, С. А. Андрюшин, С. Ю. Малков, А. А. Рубинштейн // Вопросы экономики. 2016. № 9. С. 129-149.

31. Маевский В. И., Малков С. Ю., Рубинштейн А. А. Анализ экономической динамики США, СССР и России с помощью модели ПРВ // Вопросы экономики. 2018. № 7. С. 82-95.

32. Маевский В. И., Малков С. Ю., Рубинштейн А. А. Новая теория воспроизводства капитала: развитие и практическое применение. М.; СПб.: Нестор-История, 2016. 260 с.

33. Малков С. Ю., Давыдова О. И., Билюга С. Э. Макроэкономическая производственная функция: эмпирический межстрановый анализ // Анализ и моделирование мировой и страновой динамики: экономические и политические процессы / отв. ред. С. Ю. Малков, Л. Е. Гринин. М.: Московская редакция издательства «Учитель», 2016. С. 7-26.


Review

For citations:


Malkov S.Yu., Davydova O.I. Mathematical model for analyzing the interrelation between monetary circulation and economic growth in developing countries. Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2019;13(1):981-992. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.1.981-992. EDN: YZURRZ

Views: 289


ISSN 2782-2923 (Print)