Debt and democracy of creditors
https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2025.4.701-722
Abstract
Objective: to empirically test Wolfgang Streeck’s hypothesis on the transformation of a “tax state” into a “debt state” and to assess its impact on political stability using the example of the European Union’s six developed democracies.
Methods: the study uses a comparative case study and political and economic analysis. The empirical base comprises data from the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the OECD (1990–2023) on the dynamics of gross government debt, tax revenues, interest expenses, and rates for the United Kingdom, Germany, Greece, Spain, Italy, and France. For analysis, the countries were divided into two groups: those that suffered from the debt crisis (Greece, Spain, Italy) and those that remained stable (Great Britain, France, Germany).
Results: Streeck’s hypothesis was partially confirmed. The author found that the relationship between high government debt and political instability is most pronounced in Greece, Spain and the United Kingdom. The key factor, however, is not the absolute amount of debt, but the cost of servicing it: despite its growth, low interest rates over the past decade have significantly reduced the fiscal burden. No direct relation was found for Italy and France, while for Germany the hypothesis turned out to be incorrect. Additionally, it was shown that the regime of “creditor democracy” in its purest form is typical for the countries with “negative sovereignty” (poor and some middle-income countries).
Scientific novelty: it is one of the first attempts to verify Streeck’s concept using specific macroeconomic and political data for developed countries. The author introduced the relation between the “debt state” theory and the dynamics of political stability and proposed its broad interpretation through the prism of the “negative sovereignty” theory.
Practical significance: the results obtained can be used to justify and implement a rational government debt policy, taking into account the high probability of new exogenous shocks and rising interest rates.
About the Authors
I. S. BukinaРоссия
Irina S. Bukina, Cand. Sci. (Economics), Head of the Center for macroeconomic analysis and forecast, Leading Researcher
Moscow
P. A. Orekhovskiy
Россия
Pyotr A. Orekhovskiy, Dr. Sci. (Economics), Professor, Chief Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Bakhtizin, A. R. (2024). Calculating the consequences of implementing new solutions and anti-crisis measures in the context of ongoing global fragmentation. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 248(4), 66–84. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2024-248-4-66-84
2. Baranov, A. V. (2023). Trends in Overcoming the Crisis of the People’s Party of Spain (2018–2022) in the Context of Electoral Processes. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 28(3), 104–114. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2023.3.10
3. Barro, R. J. (1974). Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095–1117. https://doi.org/10.1086/260266
4. Barro, R. J. (1989). The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.2.37
5. Bjerg, U. (2018). Making Money. The Philosophy of Crisis Capitalism. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russ.).
6. Buchanan, J. M. (1997). Constitutional Political Economy. The Calculus of Consent. The Limits of Liberty. Works. Moscow: Taurus Alpha. (In Russ.).
7. Crouch, K. (2012). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Moscow: ID Delo RANEPA. (In Russ.).
8. Eggertsson, G. B., & Woodford, M. (2003). Optimal Monetary Policy in a Liquidity Trap. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/W9968
9. Eichengreen, B., & Hausmann, R. (1999). Exchange Rates and Financial Fragility. NBER Working Paper, 7418.
10. Fischer, S. (1980). Rational Expectations and Economic Policy. University of Chicago Press.
11. Friedman, M. (1971). Government Revenue from Inflation. Journal of Political Economy, 79(4), 846–856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/259791
12. Goldstone, J. (2017). Revolutions: A Very Short Introduction. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House. (In Russ.).
13. Grigoryev, L. M. (2024). Key Challenges to the Long-Term Growth of the US Economy. Contemporary World Economy, 2(3), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.17323/2949-5776-2024-2-3-8-26 (In Russ.).
14. Guseletov, B. P. (2023). Italy: Parliamentary Elections – 2022 and Prospects for Relations with Russia. Science. Culture. Society, 29(1), 103–115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2023.29.1.8
15. Harrington, B. (2022). Capital Without Borders: Wealth Managers and the One Percent. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House. (In Russ.).
16. Held, D. (2014). Models of Democracy. Moscow: Delo. (In Russ.).
17. Henry, J. (2007). Illusion of debt cancelling. In S. Hyatt (ed.), A game as old as empire (pp. 443–536). Moscow: Pretext. (In Russ.).
18. Hoover, K. D. (1988). The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry. Blackwell.
19. International Monetary Fund. (2015, April). World Economic Outlook: Uneven Growth: Short and Long-Term Factors.
20. International Monetary Fund. (2024). Sustaining the recovery: IMF annual report 2024.
21. Jackson, R. (1990). Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559020
22. Kavanagh, D. (2018). Brexit, the Conservatives and the General Election 2017. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique. XXIII-2. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.2085
23. Keynes, J. M. (2022). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russ.).
24. Lucas, R. Jr. (1972). Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1
25. Maevsky, V. I. (2024). The possibility of targeting economic growth: theoretical aspect. AlterEconomics, 21(2), 159–178. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-2.1
26. Mauldin, D., & Tenner, D. (2013). Endgame: The End of the Debt SuperCycle and How It Changes Everything. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, and Ferber. (In Russ.).
27. Miller, S. M. (1980). Dynamic monetary and fiscal policy and the government budget constraint: A growth equilibrium. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(80)90015-4
28. Minsky, H. (2017). Stabilizing the unstable economy. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House. (In Russ.).
29. Obichkina, E. O. (2019). Political crisis in France: "gilets jaunes" and the end of the "first period" of the Emmanuel Macron’s governance. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2(65), 101–135. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-2-65-101-135
30. Olson, M. (1995). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Moscow: Foundation for Economic Initiative. (In Russ.).
31. Olson, M. (2013). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. Moscow: Novoye Izd-vo. (In Russ.).
32. Palachanin, I. A. (2023). The political struggle with the issue of a ‘hard’ Brexit during Theresa May premiership. Analysis and Forecast. Analiz i Prognoz. IMEMO RAS Journal, 1, 58–75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2023-1-58-75
33. Sachs, J. (1989). The Debt Overhang of Developing Countries. In G. Calvo (ed.), Debt, stabilization and development. Essays in memory of Carlos Díaz-Alejandro (pp. 80–102). Blackwell.
34. Sargent, Th. J. (1986). Rational Expectations and Inflation. Harper and Row.
35. Sarrazin, T. (2015). Europe Doesn't Need the Euro. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.).
36. Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. McGrawHill Book Company.
37. Schumpeter, J. (1982). The Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.).
38. Schumpeter, J. (2025). The Crisis of the Tax State. The Sociology of Imperialisms. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (In Russ.).
39. Shtreeck, W. (2019). Buying Time. The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. In A series of lectures at Frankfurt Readings in memory of Adorno. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (In Russ.).
40. Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. In Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L
41. Tideman, T. N., Tullock, G. (2004). A New and Superior Process for Making Social Choices. In A. P. Zaostrovtsev (ed.), Milestones of economic thought. Welfare economy and public choice (Vol. 4). Saint Petersburg: Economic School. (In Russ.).
42. Tilly, C. (1975). Reflections on the History of European State-Making. In C. Tilly (ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe (pp. 3–83). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
43. Timoshenkova, E. P. (2022). Angela Merkel’s Leadership Lessons: The Secret of Political Longevity (2013–2021). Her. Russ. Acad. Sci., 92(2), S119–S125. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622080111
44. Ulunyan, A. A. (2024). Foreign policy guidelines of Greek political parties (2015–2023): The birth of a new reality. The Authority, 32(2), 223–233. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-5358-2024-2-223-233
45. United Nations. (2025). Least Developed Country Category. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/least-developed-country-category.html
46. Vasilopoulou, S., Halikiopoulou, D., & Exadaktylos, Th. (2014). Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12093
Review
For citations:
Bukina I.S., Orekhovskiy P.A. Debt and democracy of creditors. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2025;19(4):701-722. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2025.4.701-722
JATS XML



























